Boltzmann's version of 2nd Law -log relationship

AI Thread Summary
Boltzmann defined entropy (S) as S = k log W, where W represents the number of microstates and k is a constant. The logarithmic relationship is crucial because it allows the entropy of combined systems to be additive; for two systems, the total number of states is the product of individual states (W_a * W_b), necessitating the logarithm to maintain the additive property of entropy. This ensures that S(container A & container B) equals S(container A) plus S(container B). The discussion also touches on the transition from Boltzmann's entropy formula to Planck's energy equation E = hf, though the reasoning behind this shift is not fully explored. Understanding this relationship is essential for grasping the foundations of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics.
celal777
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello List,

I understand Boltzmann defined entropy as log W where W is the number of microstates in the system time a constant "k" ; hence S= k Log W.

Can someone explain to me where the logarithmic relationship comes from please ?

Many thanks in advance,

Celal Berker
London, England
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want the Entropy to be a quantum that adds up when you're looking at more than one system: E. g. if you have two containers filled with gas, you want the relationship S(container A & container B) = S(container A) + S(container B).

But if the system A has W_a states and the system B has W_b states, the combined system has W_a W_b states: a product, not a sum. So youo have to take the logarithm of this number to get the relation above.
 
Many Thanks Bruno (is that your name?)

So how did Planck, by what thought or reasoning processes did he go from the relation S= k log W to E=Hf ?

--Celal
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top