Bonds Form When Energy is Gained: Na Cation

  • Thread starter Thread starter LogicalAcid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonds Form
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy dynamics involved in the removal and addition of valence electrons, particularly in sodium (Na). It highlights that the energy required to remove a valence electron from Na is greater than the energy released when that electron is added to another atom to form a cation. This raises questions about the fate of the excess energy that is not accounted for in the bond formation process. The conversation clarifies that bonds typically form when energy is released, but the energy balance in ionization and electron transfer can be complex. A key point of confusion is addressed regarding the terminology, specifically the distinction between cations and anions, emphasizing that adding an electron results in an anion, not a cation.
LogicalAcid
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
When energy is to be gained correct? It takes more energy to take a valence electron off Na than energy is gained when it is put on another atom to make a cation. I know the energy didn't just disappear, energy never does, what happened to the remaining energy that wasn't gained?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Do bonds only form when energy is to be gained?

If that is the case, why does it take more energy to take a valence electron off Na than energy is gained when it is attached to another atom to make a cation?
 
(Moderator note -- two similar threads merged)
 
You are confusing something, you can't add electron to atom to make it a cation.
 
Borek said:
You are confusing something, you can't add electron to atom to make it a cation.
Ion,sorry.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top