Book Suggestions for Undergraduate Topology Class

  • Thread starter Thread starter cap.r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Suggestion
cap.r
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am taking my first Under graduate topology class and the class is using Topology by Munkres it's a great book and he has done a good job with explaining things.

but I always like to read from at least two different books and see more examples before I try the homework or convince myself that I know the material.

so any suggestions?

The chapters we will be doing are :
2 Topological Spaces and continuous Functions
3 Connectedness and Compactness
4 Countability and Separation Axioms
9 The Fundamental Group
10 Separation Theorems in the plane
12 Classification of Surfaces
13 Classification of Covering spaces

the last two might not happen if we don't have enough time...

the prof. also recommended Basic Topology by M.A. Armstrong as a secondary reference. but I thought I would check it out before I purchased that one.

thanks,
RK
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looks like your course could be described as an introduction to topology/algebraic topology.

The Armstrong book has been used at UC Berkeley for just such a course, so it should be a nice secondary reference. This year, however, https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521298644/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by John Lee. It covers approximately the same material as Munkres at about the same level. You might look for some or all of these books in your library to see if one or more of them suits you.

HTH

Petek
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I recently acquired General Topology by Stephen Willard and really like it. It's a general topology book so you may not find a lot of stuff on covering spaces or classification of surfaces in it (it does have a couple of sections on the fundamental group though, and some intro to covering spaces in the exercises). Anyway it nicely complements Munkres and is pretty cheap so I thought I'd mention it. I haven't read the book by Armstrong so I don't know how this one compares. I would also like to second the recommendation of Introduction to Topological Manifolds. It has most of what you want, and in my opinion it does a slightly better job of preparing you for subsequent algebraic topology courses than Munkres.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top