Boolean Algebra - Simplest POS / SOP

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the simplest forms of Product of Sums (POS) and Sum of Products (SOP) in Boolean algebra. The user seeks clarification on whether their expression for POS, (A+B+C')(A+B'+C)(C+D), is already in its simplest form or requires further minimization. It is clarified that having A, B, C, and D in every term is unnecessary for simplification, as the provided expression is already simpler than a product of maxterms. Additionally, the user questions if the expression ABC+BD+A'BCD' represents a minimal SOP, acknowledging that while terms can be combined to reduce literals, they are considering the expression as is. Understanding these concepts is crucial for mastering Boolean algebra simplification techniques.
xenocid3r
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey all

So i just need some clarification, though I hope I am posting in right section (this is not a HW Q)

I was told to find the simplest Product of Sums(POS) and Sum of Products(SOP)

1st 2nd 3rd
|| || ||
now i know that POS mean that (A+B+C')(A+B'+C)(C+D). Is the simplest form of this expression is that I need to have ABCD in every term there. or is this form is already simplest. Do I need to add D to the first 2 terms and A and B to the 3rd?
I mean do i need to use the distributive law in order to minimize an expression like that?

I was trying to look in my textbook but could understand it very clearly. Would appreciate if someone can explain that to me.

P.S. the expression above is not part of the homework, I just gave something random. I am trying to understand the concept and not to solve it.

Thanks for anyone who will try to help me here

Xeno
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
xenocid3r said:
now i know that POS mean that (A+B+C')(A+B'+C)(C+D). Is the simplest form of this expression is that I need to have ABCD in every term there.

No, if you had A, B, C, and D in every product term, then the expression would be a product of maxterms. The expression you posted is simpler than the equivalent product of maxterms.
 
Thanks for the reply.

another thing. in a sum of products, can I have ABC+BD+A'BCD'. Is this consider a minimal SOP? I know I can combine the above terms to get rid of few literals. but just for the sake of it, let's assume it isn't possible.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top