Boson statistics and the uncertainty principle

neerajareen
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
This question is regarding the boson statistics and it’s relation to the uncertainty principle. Consider we have a vacuum state and we apply a field operator on it to create a particle at position x, we end up with state like

\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{e^{ - ipx}}} \left| p \right\rangle
\end{array}

So there is an equal probability for all momentum. And the result is completely consistent with the uncertainty principle.
Now consider a situation where we have created 99 bosons with momentum k. Using the statistics of creation of creation operators, when we now add an additional particle, we have


\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {e^{ - i{p_1}x}}\left| {1,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_2}x}}\left| {0,1,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_k}x}}\sqrt {100} \left| {0,0,100,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_{k + 1}}x}}\left| {0,0,99,1,...} \right\rangle
\end{array}/

We see that that when we create the now particle, it is more likely to have momentum k than any other momentum by a factor of 100. In the limit that we have a thousand billion particles in a certain momentum and then create a particle at a certain position, with almost 100% we can determine the momentum that it will have. Does this not violate the uncertainty principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
just to clarify

/dag is the dagger symbol (hermitian conjugate).
 
neerajareen said:
This question is regarding the boson statistics and it’s relation to the uncertainty principle. Consider we have a vacuum state and we apply a field operator on it to create a particle at position x, we end up with state like

\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{e^{ - ipx}}} \left| p \right\rangle
\end{array}

So there is an equal probability for all momentum. And the result is completely consistent with the uncertainty principle.
Now consider a situation where we have created 99 bosons with momentum k. Using the statistics of creation of creation operators, when we now add an additional particle, we have


\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {e^{ - i{p_1}x}}\left| {1,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_2}x}}\left| {0,1,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_k}x}}\sqrt {100} \left| {0,0,100,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_{k + 1}}x}}\left| {0,0,99,1,...} \right\rangle
\end{array}/

We see that that when we create the now particle, it is more likely to have momentum k than any other momentum by a factor of 100. In the limit that we have a thousand billion particles in a certain momentum and then create a particle at a certain position, with almost 100% we can determine the momentum that it will have. Does this not violate the uncertainty principle?


What does your notation \left| {0,0,99,1,...} \right\rangle mean?
 
In order to have an effect of boson statistics, you need indistinguishable particles. So you do not get n individual particles, but one n-particle state. So in adding a particle, you go from the n-1 to the n-particle state. It is the position and momentum of the whole state of indistinguishable particles you need to consider. If this whole state has a pretty sharp momentum, it will be rather delocalized. If you (let us just assume that is possible somehow) create a particle that is localized better than the n-1 particle state, the added particle and the other particles cannot be completely indistinguishable, so the bosonic enhancement factor will not be n, but smaller.
 
Thank you Cthuga. That makes sense
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top