Boundary condition (Electromagnetics)

GUGGI
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I got some problem about using boundary conditions,especially in the fifth pics,those sentences marked by red.I really don't know how to use
Js=An x H,since I don't know the fields well enough.Some questions of mine are illustrated in the sixth pic by different colors.

I'm sorry the pics are so ugly.If someone can understand me,please give me some hints. It's too late and I must go to bed,I'll edit it tomorrow.Thanks!


http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28028953&fullsize=1&SID=

[PLAIN]http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28030490&fullsize=1&SID=

[PLAIN]http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28030490&fullsize=1&SID=
http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28027945&fullsize=1&SID=
http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28027979&fullsize=1&SID=
http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28029476&fullsize=1&SID=
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, do you know how these boundary conditions are derived ? What is the theory behind that ? I don't understand what you mean by

"I really don't know how to use
Js=An x H,since I don't know the fields well enough"

Are you saying you do not know the H-field in this situation ? I mean it is derived in the pictures you show us. Or are you asking why this boundary condition is valid or how you acquire it's formula ? To answer that, try answering my first question to you.

You need to be a bit more specific, please.

marlon
 
In the last two pic,it said that Hy0 satisfied Js=An x H at z=-L.

My most confused question is,why doesn't author choose z=0?
I guess the boundary in consideration is x=0,
then at z=0,x<0 Hy0 exists,x>0 Hy0=0

This situation is the same as at z=-L,x<0 Hy0 exist ,x>0 Hy0=0.isn't it?

And Hy0 is not varying with z,so Hyo at z=0 should be the same as Hy0 at z=-L.So I think at z=0 Hy0 might aslo satisfied Js=An x H.

But if Hy0 satisfied Js=An x H at z=0,which means Hy2=0 at z=-L,then by (5.98),C=0,a different answer.

I must be somewhere wrong,I really want to find it out.@@

Thanks for attention.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top