Boundary condition of EM field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the boundary conditions of electromagnetic fields, specifically questioning the continuity of the tangential components of the displacement field \vec{D} and polarization \vec{P} across boundaries of different dielectric constants. It is established that while the tangential components of electric fields are continuous, the same may not hold for \vec{D} and \vec{P} if the dielectric constants differ. The relationship between \vec{D} and electric field \vec{E} is highlighted, indicating that a change in dielectric constant could disrupt the continuity of \vec{D}. Additionally, the role of surface current density \vec{K} in magnetic field conditions is examined, along with the concept of polarized charge density \sigma_p. The discussion ultimately emphasizes the need to consider dielectric properties when analyzing boundary conditions in electromagnetism.
KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
On the boundary (surface) of two regions, the tangential components of electric fields on above and below surface are continuous. I wonder if it is also true for displacement \vec{D} and polarization \vec{P}? That is, can I say:
the tangential component of \vec{D} or \vec{P} on above and below surface are continuous?

For magnetic field, the statement of the magnetic field about \vec{B} is:

(\vec{B}_{above} - \vec{B}_{below} )\cdot\hat{n} = 0
and
(\vec{B}_{above} - \vec{B}_{below} )\times \hat{n} = \mu_0\vec{K}

I wonder if \vec{K} means the free current surface density? What is the boundary conditions for \vec{H}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do the two regions have the same dielectric constant? Think about the formula that relates D and E...
 
Xezlec said:
Do the two regions have the same dielectric constant? Think about the formula that relates D and E...

That is the question. In the text, it said the tangential components of the electric fields on the boundary are continuous. But it doesn't tell if the tangential components of the displacement or polarization are also continuous or not. So if the dielectric constants in these two regions not the same, does it mean they will not be continuous even along the tangential direction?

By the way, in some text, it reads

(\vec{P}_2-\vec{P}_1)\cdot\hat{n} = -\sigma_p

and \sigma_p is what we call the density of polarized charges. I wonder if this is the same name as bound charges which is used in other text?
 
Last edited:
KFC said:
That is the question. In the text, it said the tangential components of the electric fields on the boundary are continuous. But it doesn't tell if the tangential components of the displacement or polarization are also continuous or not. So if the dielectric constants in these two regions not the same, does it mean they will not be continuous even along the tangential direction?

I was just saying that by looking at the formula that relates D and E, you will see the answer to that question. The dielectric constant is the constant of proportionality between D and E, so if E is continuous, but the dielectric constant changes, what is going to happen to D? See what I mean?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top