Box slides down incline, air resistance does work. Find Velocity.

AI Thread Summary
A 38.7g box sliding down a 12.5m incline experiences -3.71J of work due to air resistance. The initial approach to calculate the final speed incorrectly accounted for the negative work twice, leading to an erroneous result of 20.9m/s instead of the correct 7.30m/s. The correct formula should consider the potential energy at the top and the work done, expressed as E kinetic at bottom = E potential at top + Work. This adjustment clarifies that the negative work reduces the kinetic energy, resulting in a lower final speed. The problem was resolved by correctly applying the work done by air resistance in the calculations.
EroAlchemist
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 38.7g box slides down an incline of height 12.5m. As it slides, air resistance does -3.71J of work. Find the speed at which it reaches the bottom of the incline.

Homework Equations



E kinetic at bottom = E potential at top - Work air resistance
1/2 mv2 - 1/2 mvorig2 = mgh - (-3.71J)


The Attempt at a Solution



1/2(.0387kg)(v2) = (.0387kg)(9.8m/s2)(12.5m) - (-3.71J)

v= sqrt 8.45J / .01935kg = 20.9m/s

Book gives the correct answer as being 7.30m/s.
Can anybody tell where I went wrong here? Thanks much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've basically accounted for the negative nature of the work TWICE. First in your set up for the formula:

E kinetic at bottom = E potential at top - Work air resistance

and then again a second time when you actually plugged in the number (-3.71 J). Only one of these negative signs should be there. A more general way to do it would be to set up the formula without assuming anything about the sign of the work:

E kinetic at bottom = E potential at top + Work

This is a general formula since TWO things contribute (or "add") to the KE at the bottom 1. All of the PE is converted into KE and 2. Any work done on the object during its journey also results in a change in KE.

Now, when you plug a negative number into the equation, it takes into account that the contribution to the KE described by 2 happens to be negative in this example

Intuitively this should make sense as well, since the final KE is smaller than it would have been without the air resistance (whereas in your example, the final KE was larger than it would have been w/o the air resistance, which makes no sense).
 
Thanks for the help! I added the work this time and got the correct answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top