Medical Brain activity is 30 times more active when emotional

  • Thread starter Thread starter rookie37
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Activity Brain
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of emotions on the brain, particularly in the context of affirmations. John practices positive affirmations daily but simultaneously harbors negative thoughts about the world, which he engages with for several hours each day. This pattern suggests that his negative emotions may overshadow the benefits of his affirmations. The conversation seeks scientific evidence, such as case studies or brain scans, to support the idea that emotional states significantly affect brain activity. It is noted that emotional engagement can lead to increased activity in specific brain regions, while passive affirmation may not elicit the same response. The distinction between MRI and CT scans is emphasized, with MRI being more suitable for studying functional brain activity. Additionally, the importance of understanding brain activity in context is highlighted, cautioning against assuming that increased activity correlates directly with positive outcomes.
rookie37
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a few emotion questions and how it effect the brain

I'm know little of physics or medicine

I'm doing research on affirmations.


John does positive affirmations
john reads a self help book and visualises and repeats;
I'm rich and successful many times. He does this for 30 minutes each day

However when he does this he is passive

Then he spends most of his day thinking about how much the world sucks. He has insomnia and spends hours awake thinking how somebody screwed him over.

In other words, He is doing affirmations about the negative. He is very emotional and thinks how the world sucks 7 hour each day, 7 days a week and has done this for years.

Obviously this overrides his positive affirmations.


I'm looking for numbers and scientific proof supporting this such as case studies or cat scans
I.E. the brain activity is 30 times more active when emotional than when passive
 
Biology news on Phys.org


rookie37 said:
I'm looking for numbers and scientific proof supporting this such as case studies or cat scans
I.E. the brain activity is 30 times more active when emotional than when passive

I don't know of any studies that would address the specific question you're asking, though will point out that I would doubt you'd see a difference overall in activity of the brain. What you're instead likely to see is that when someone is saying something they don't really believe, the activity will be increased in places like language centers of the brain. When they are feeling very negative the rest of the time, the activity would then likely be increased in the emotional centers of the brain and not so much in language centers (unless they really are muttering this out loud all day).

Just because we focus on discussions of science here, I'm going to be a bit picky about your terminology though, just for the sake of learning. You may find scientific evidence to support your argument, but proof is not something science provides because what we are always doing is attempting to falsify hypotheses...trying to disprove things, not prove them.

As you're looking or waiting for other responses here, I will also point out that the types of studies you're looking for should be MRI studies, not CT scans. CT scans will identify gross abnormalities, restrictions of blood flow, strokes, tumors, that sort of thing. They really don't identify functional differences in the brain activity. MRIs can do that.

Also, be careful not to bias your search expecting that increases in brain activity must be associated with more efficacy. You need to consider what each part of the brain does. An area that is inhibitory being less active could be more important than a stimulatory area being more active, for example.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top