Bridge circuit - 5 eqns with 5 unknowns

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equivalent resistance (Req) of a bridge circuit using five equations with five unknowns based on Kirchhoff's laws. The user has formulated the equations but struggles with solving the system, particularly in expressing all currents in terms of a single current 'I' to simplify the final substitution. Suggestions include using equation 3 to eliminate I4 and solving for I5 from equation 2, while keeping I1 and I3 for later calculations. The process is acknowledged to be complex, indicating that the next steps will involve messy algebra. The conversation emphasizes the need for strategic substitutions to progress towards the solution.
skierboy
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The bridge circuit for this problem:
http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/7366/bridgecircuit.jpg

I have to derive a formula for the equivalent resistance (Req) of the bridge circuit shown in the link.

Homework Equations



I've been able to come up with the 5 equations with 5 unknowns using Kirchoff's loop and junction laws. They are as follows:

1) I = I1 + I2
2) I1 = I3 + I5
3) I4 = I2 + I5
4) I1R1 + I5R5 = I2R2
5) I5R5 + I4R4 = I3R3

Also, IReq = I1R1 + I3R3

so, Req = (I1R1 + I3R3)/I

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having trouble starting to solve this system of equations. I've tried various substitutions but they have all led me to dead ends.

Based on equation 6, I know that I have to express all the currents across each resistor in terms of 'I', so that 'I' cancels when doing the final substitution in equation 6, leaving only the resistors.

I am not asking for a full derivation, but simply some direction as to how to approach solving this system.

Thank you in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You also have an equation for the current coming out: 7) I3 + I4 = I.
I would suggest using the relatively simple eqn 3 to eliminate all the I4s. That is, replace all I4 entries with I2 + I5. Likewise, solve eqn 2 for I5 and eliminate all the I5 entries. I'm trying to keep I1 and I3 so you can solve for them and use them in eqn 6. Solve eqn 1 for I2 eliminate that. The next steps, solving for I1 and I3 will be rather messy!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top