Classical BSL Transport Phenom. vs. BSLK Introductory Transport Phenom

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison between "Transport Phenomena" (2nd edition) and "Introductory Transport Phenomena" (1st edition) for self-study in transport phenomena. The BSLK Introductory Transport Phenomena emphasizes more detailed mathematical derivations and explanations, making it suitable for undergraduates, while the standard BSL version is praised for its comprehensive learning experience and rigor. Users report that BSLK's additional details enhance understanding, particularly for those who appreciate thorough mathematical foundations. The BSL textbook is noted for its effectiveness in teaching fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and mass transfer processes. Overall, both texts have their merits, with BSLK being more accessible for beginners.
humphreybogart
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
I'd like to purchase one of these books for self-study. The BSLK Introductory Transport Phenomena claims:

"Devoting more space to mathematical derivations and providing fuller explanations of mathematical developments—including a section of the appendix devoted to mathematical topics—allows students to comprehend transport phenomena concepts at an undergraduate level."

Also, from the Preface:

"You will find that considerably more space has been devoted to filling in missing steps in mathematical derivations and to fuller explanations of mathematical developments, including an enlargement of the appendix devoted to mathematical topics; in addition, much material has been removed that we felt was beyond the level of mathematical preparation of most undergraduates. Our intention was to make this book reflect the topics covered in our undergraduate course, with the exception of a few advanced topics for the brightest students. Finally, we removed the chapters dealing with two independent variables and replaced them with chapters on dimensional analysis, including the much-used Buckingham pi theorem."

Does anyone have experience of the two, and could you offer your comparisons and comments? I will be self-studying.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've no clue about which books you are talking about. Citing correctly is the 0th step for successful communication in science. So please give the authors, title, publisher, edition, and year of the books, so that they can be uniquely identified. Maybe some of the readers here know them and can tell you whether they are worth reading.
 
Transport Phenomena (2nd edition) by https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1?ie=UTF8&text=R.+Byron+Bird&search-alias=books-uk&field-author=R.+Byron+Bird&sort=relevancerank&tag=, https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_2?ie=UTF8&text=Warren+E.+Stewart&search-alias=books-uk&field-author=Warren+E.+Stewart&sort=relevancerank&tag=, https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_3?ie=UTF8&text=Edwin+N.+Lightfoot&search-alias=books-uk&field-author=Edwin+N.+Lightfoot&sort=relevancerank&tag=

Introductory Transport Phenomena (1st edition) by https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1?ie=UTF8&text=R.+Byron+Bird&search-alias=books-uk&field-author=R.+Byron+Bird&sort=relevancerank&tag=, https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_2?ie=UTF8&text=Warren+E.+Stewart&search-alias=books-uk&field-author=Warren+E.+Stewart&sort=relevancerank&tag= , https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_3?ie=UTF8&text=Edwin+N.+Lightfoot&search-alias=books-uk&field-author=Edwin+N.+Lightfoot&sort=relevancerank&tag= & Daniel J. Klingenberg
 
Unfortunately I don't know these books :-(.
 
I've never used Introductory Transport Phenomena, but the standard version of BSL is an excellent textbook by itself. Perhaps my favorite textbook ever. I've used it for junior year courses in transport phenomena and mass transfer and a senior year course in process modeling and never felt it unsuitable for undergraduate students. The lack of steps in mathematical derivations and solutions may encourage you to learn new bits of math (even if it's the cookbook way) in order to prove what the authors show. This textbook really offers a remarkable learning experience, not just for chemical engineers, but for any scientist interested in modeling fluid dynamics, heat transfer and mass transfer processes.
 
Used BSLK in the first possible semester that BSLK was available. Before the semester began, I was very glad that we would be using BSLK, because of the mentioned extra details in the derivations. In my experience using BSLK, the derivations (which I studied thoroughly) allow for a very strong understanding of transport phenomena. I am the type of person who does not like to lose out on opportunities to be exposed to high levels of rigor, and I did not find this to be lacking.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
17K
Back
Top