Build a Simple IR Receiver Circuit for LED Lighting | Easy Instructions

  • Thread starter Thread starter wzeller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ir Receiver
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on building a simple infrared (IR) receiver circuit to light an LED in response to an IR signal, specifically for use in a church setting. Users express frustration with overly complex designs and seek straightforward instructions and component lists. The TSOP1738 chip is suggested for its ability to filter out ambient light interference, although it requires a 38KHz carrier signal. Participants discuss circuit simplifications, including the potential removal of unnecessary components like the 555 timer, and the use of a transistor to amplify the LED output. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for a basic, efficient circuit that minimizes battery drain while effectively responding to IR signals.
wzeller
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've been looking all over the Internet for what I thought would be an easy thing to find instructions on. Unfortunatley, anything that comes close either complicates the matter with extra features or assumes I know a lot more about electronics than I do...

I need to build a very simple circuit: When it detects an infrared signal, it lights up an LED which stays lit for as long as the IR signal is active.

The problem is that it needs to not drain it's battery much when it is subjected to ambient light, including some sunlight through stained-glass windows. (This is going to go into a church and will serve as a stand-up signal for the choir.)

Everything I have found online is either too sensitive to ambient light, or has decoding chips for complex signals. I just need something very simple.

If I had just a components list of stuff that I could get at Radio Shack or similar places, I'm sure I could easily figure out how it works and build it.

Does anybody have any suggestions on where I could start? (I used to think I was a little proficient with electronics. In researching this, and seeing the "simple" circuits offered up on the Internet, I've come to realize that I'm much more clueless than I ever imagined.) :(

Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Wayne
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
http://www.mitedu.freeserve.co.uk/Circuits/Interface/irext4.htm

Its a full blown IR repeater circuit, but you only really need a few parts, but the parts you don't need are cheap anyways...

The TSOP1738 chip ends in a 38 because its looking for a 38KHz IR remote control signal, so it may not work for you. But it does have a filter on it to try to prevent sunlight/flourescent light interference and outputs only the pulses with the 38KHz carrier removed.

You can get an equivalent chip to replace the TSOP1738 as instead something like the Vishay TSOP4838 (or other form factors or frequencies with slightly different part numbers) from Mouser.com for just a little over a dollar. The rest of the parts will still amount to less than $10.

If you don't have a 38KHz carrier signal, then your options change, these chips are designed to reject non-modulated signals.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Closer, btu still hoping for simpler

Thanks for that link - it helped me understand a little better about what I'm attempting.

I'm having a hard time, though, figuring out what can be removed from it and what can't.

If the TSOP1738 is built to reject unmodulated signals, then does that imply that I can do away with the 555 and almost everything else?

If I just take a battery, a TSOP1738, and a red LED and wire them together with appropriate resistors to bring the voltage down, will the led flash when the TSOP1738 is hit by a 38kHz IR signal?

To make it last as long as possible between battery changes, I'm thinking of using a nine volt battery. So, would I go from battery positive, through an adequately large resistor, to the high side of the TSOP1738, then from the low side of the TSOP1738 to the battery negative and from the TSOP1738 output through the LED to the battery negative?

And if that would work, then how big of a resistor would I need to throw in there between the 9V battery and the TSOP1738? (And, would other resistors or components be required to make it work?)

Thanks,
Marshall
 
Basic Infra Red Tx & Rcv

How about this reference. They show basic circuits for an infrared transmitter and reciever (look towards bottom of that webpage).. They say its range is about 4 meters but could be increased up to 15m with additional components.
 
Marshall - yes, you are correct that you could eliminate the 555 because all it does is re-modulate the signal with a 38KHz carrier. The IR receiver chip simply outputs demodulated pulses because IR remote controls send out a specific series of pulses for the different commands.

http://www.mouser.com/catalog/624/92.pdf
Based on the form factor, its the TSOP1238 that is pretty much the equivalent, the 4838 is a miniature version. No real difference besides form factor, 4838 has more 'cool' factor because of its small size.

http://www.vishay.com/docs/82013/82013.pdf

The output current is only 5mA max and if I recall correctly the output is held high so it makes sense to throw a transistor on the output to really light the LED when you send pulses.

Given that the voltage on 9V batteries changes so much as it discharges (in my experience anyways) I'd just run a 7805 regulator and be done with it.

Battery + and - to respective 7805 pins.

7805 output to 4838 Vss and 4838 - to batt -

4838 output to 3.3K resistor to base of transistor with 390 ohm current limiting resistor in series with LED, maybe change resistor to fit your specific LED.

You'd want to test the output of the 4838 to see if its high or low to and use the appropriate PNP or NPN transistor like maybe a BC327 instead of a BC337.

If you wanted to experiment with something like Ouabache linked to, you could also use one of the BP103 equivalent phototransistors like a QSD123 that has an output current of 16mA.
http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/QS/QSD123.pdf

So then it'd be battery + to QSD123 collector and QSD123 emitter to LED anode and LED cathode to battery - and you're done. Part count of 2 but the narrow angle of reception and inability to reject ambient light present in that narrow range may be a problem. 2 is a pretty low number though and you could twist the leads together and test in seconds!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Ouabache and Cliff_J!

I think I've got all the info I need now. (What a cool forum!)

Wayne (aka Marshall)
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top