Building a 300-Foot Hill: The Science Behind Slope Stability and Skiability

  • Thread starter Thread starter Erazman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill
AI Thread Summary
To build a 300-foot hill suitable for skiing, heavy equipment is essential, and utilizing pre-existing terrain is advisable. A suggested method involves excavating a sloping trench to half the desired height and using the excavated dirt to create a ramp, effectively reducing construction effort. An unconventional idea is to consider a landfill approach, compacting garbage and covering it with dirt, though this raises concerns about stability and environmental issues. Ensuring slope stability is crucial, as improper construction could lead to hazards. Overall, careful planning and consideration of local regulations are necessary for successful hill construction.
Erazman
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
What would be the easiest way to build a 300 foot hill -- one with a slope gentle enough to ski on in the winter?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Do you mean 300 ft long, or 300 ft high? Either way, you've got your work cut out for you. I'd really try to find a pre-existing one, but I suppose that you've already ruled that out. You'll need heavy equipment, in any event. Maybe if you sweet-talk Brewnog enough, he'll send over one of those nice big yellow toys. :biggrin:
My strictly amateur opinion is that you should cut your work in half by excavating a long, sloping trench to half of the height (depth) that you want, and piling the dirt up in a matching ramp that extends from it. That way you'll have a 300 ft high slope, but only 150 ft needs to be built up.
Very seriously here, despite that it might sound like a joke: I'd approach everyone in your vicinity and see if they'd be willing (if zoning allows) to start a landfill type setup on your property. Once there's enough garbage (meticulously compacted, of course) piled up, you can cover it with a layer of dirt and be done with it. You'd have to check into all of the possible negatives, though, such as smell, spontaneous combustion, etc..
 
I agree, but you will wind up with a large hole which will need pumps and have to ensure that your cut slopes are stable.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top