Building a half wavelength dipole antenna

AI Thread Summary
When building a half wavelength dipole antenna, the spacing between the ends should be approximately 4-5 cm for HF frequencies, decreasing to about 1 cm for SHF frequencies. The gap distance is more critical for transmitting than receiving, as it affects the feedpoint impedance. For feedlines, coaxial cables (75 Ohm) are recommended over parallel wires due to ease of mounting and impedance matching, requiring a balun for proper connection. The discussion also highlights that while 1.5 wavelength antennas can provide greater gain, the half wave dipole is simpler and effective for most applications. More specific details about the intended frequencies and use would help refine the advice further.
TriflingTroy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Alright so I am building a few half wavelength dipole antennas for a project and was wondering how large the space should be between each side of the dipole antenna. I have asked a radio forum and they could not help me so I came here. Thanks.

Also I herd that an 1 and a half wavelength antennas are stronger, is this true?

Also how would wires in parallel work here such as a twin lead wire?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
hi there
welcome to PF

Tell us more about these dipoles ... are they part of a phased array or individual dipoles of different frequencies ?

Are they going to be vertical or horizontally polarised ?
if vertically polarised, are they going to be side by side or stacked above each other ?

same questions for horizontal dipoles

all these variations make a huge differencecheers
Dave
 
TriflingTroy said:
Also how would wires in parallel work here such as a twin lead wire?
what for ? the feedline or the antennas ?
 
Sorry i am a novice with these sort of projects. Anyway they will be individual dipoles with different frequencies that will arranged horizontally. There will also only be one up at a time. The parallel wires will be for the feedline, and what I was wondering on that aspect is the difference of Coaxial Wire and twin lead wire.

Thanks
-Ethan
 
TriflingTroy said:
Anyway they will be individual dipoles with different frequencies that will arranged horizontally. There will also only be one up at a time.

Hi Ethan OK

OK I did misunderstand what you initially said

you haven't said what frequencies you are using or if this is for transmitting, receiving or both ??
here's a pic of an HF freq dipole feed, for 30MHZ

images.jpg


the gap between those ends will be around 4 - 5 cm ( ~ 2 inches)
This gap will get smaller as you go up in freq,
at VHF say 144MHz ham band they will be around 3 cm
at UHF say 432MHz ham band they will be around 2 cm
at SHF say 1296MHz ham band they will be around 1 cm

the distance isn't absolutely critical and as long as you are close to those measurements you will be OK
its more critical for transmitting than receiving ( the gap distance will affect the impedance of the feedpoint)
TriflingTroy said:
The parallel wires will be for the feedline, and what I was wondering on that aspect is the difference of Coaxial Wire and twin lead wire.

personally I wouldn't use parallel wire feedlines just too difficult a job mounting them on mast etc and you will need BALUNs as they won't have the correct impedance. A straight dipole has an impedance of 75 Ohms so would normally require a 75 Ohm impedance feedline, say RG59 coax ( if for transmitting, for lower powers (up to ~ 100W) RG6 for higher powers ... several 100 W) tho you can get away with using 50 Ohm coax say RG58 or RG8, RG213.

EDIT addition, you want to be building 1/2 wave dipoles ... each side will be 1/4 wavelength longdoes that help ? :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
TriflingTroy said:
Sorry i am a novice with these sort of projects. Anyway they will be individual dipoles with different frequencies that will arranged horizontally. There will also only be one up at a time. The parallel wires will be for the feedline, and what I was wondering on that aspect is the difference of Coaxial Wire and twin lead wire.

Thanks
-Ethan

What frequencies are these antennas going to be receiving on? Are you planning on transmitting as well? If so, what are you using for your transmitter?

Coax (50 Ohm or 75 Ohm) is an "unbalanced" transmission line, because the 2 conductors are not symmetric. You use a "balun" at the feedpoint of the antenna to convert from the unbalanced coax to the balanced 75 Ohm input of the dipole. If you are using a "balanced" twin-lead feedline, you will still need something like a balun at the feedpoint to convert from the ~300 Ohm characteristic impedance of the twin-lead feedline to the 75 Ohm input impedance of the dipole antenna.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feed_line

:smile:

EDIT -- Dave beats me to the punch yet again!
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
berkeman said:
Coax (50 Ohm or 75 Ohm) is an "unbalanced" transmission line, because the 2 conductors are not symmetric. You use a "balun" at the feedpoint of the antenna to convert from the unbalanced coax to the balanced 75 Ohm input of the dipole.

I didn't get a chance to get to that point
that is definitely an important considerationThanks for your addition :smile:

here's a drawing of a 1/4 wave sleeve BALUN for use with a coax feed

untitled.png
 
TriflingTroy said:
1 and a half wavelength antennas are stronger,
You are talking about antenna gain, which is really to do with the directivity of the pattern. How important is gain for you? Designing and building antennas is quite hard unless you stick to well established types and the half wave dipole is best unless you really need it to be clever. Coax is obviously the thing to go for and there are plenty of designs of balun arrangement that will give a balanced drive and help with the match at the same time. If you are transmitting, the match needs to be better.
I am surprised that a "radio forum" didn't shower you with alternatives for a home made dipole design. Have you tried Amateur Radio Society sites? They are usually good for practical help. What operating frequencies are you planning to use? Is the spread so wide that you can't use a single dipole?
As usual, I think you need to provide more specific information about this project so that answers can be targeted better to your needs.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top