Calculating Building Height with Free Fall Kinematics | Spider-Man Example

  • Thread starter Thread starter abhikesbhat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Height
AI Thread Summary
Spider-Man falls from a building, covering a distance of h, with h/4 in the last second of his fall. The discussion involves using kinematic equations to determine the height h. The correct approach separates the fall into two segments, with the first segment being three times the height of the last segment. After applying the equations and solving, participants confirm that the height h is approximately 273 meters. The calculations yield consistent results, affirming the accuracy of the solution.
abhikesbhat
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Spider-Man steps from the top of a tall building. He falls freely from rest to the ground a distance of h. He falls a distance of h/4 in the last 1 second of his fall. What is h?


Homework Equations


All kinematic equations with free fall.


The Attempt at a Solution


I separated the motion into 2 cases where there was one part three times higher than the other. I made a bunch of equations that lead to nothing. Apparently I don't understand this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which equations did you make? How do they lead to nothing?
 
Is it 276m?

What I did:

Let l = h/4

The Kinematics equation s = vit + 1/2 *at2

-l=v3l(1s) - 5*(1)2

gives (5-l) = v3

The distance spiderman moves before this is 3l, so using

vf2=vi2+2as

Vi is 0 since he starts from rest

so (5-l)^2=2*3*g*l

gives the quadratic equation l2-70x+25=0

Solving gives x = 0.358984 or 69.641

Multiply by 4 to get h.

I'm not sure if it's right though :rolleyes:
 
I made a bunch of equations that lead to nothing.

I think you just need the right 2 equations.

Focus on the time to fall. It falls 3/4 of the way in T1.

3/4*h = 1/2*g*T12

and

h = 1/2*g*T22

where T2 = T1 + 1

Solve for the total time and it's all down hill from there.
 
Thanks guys! That was a nice way to this problem LowlyPion. Also thanks physicsnoob93. I got 273m as my answer. I am pretty sure that's right after checking. Again thanks!
 
abhikesbhat said:
Thanks guys! That was a nice way to this problem LowlyPion. Also thanks physicsnoob93. I got 273m as my answer. I am pretty sure that's right after checking. Again thanks!
Not that it matters now, but I tried it both ways and they both give the same answer, 273m...
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top