Bulk Angular Momentum: Definition & Explanation

AI Thread Summary
Bulk angular momentum refers to the overall angular momentum of an object, calculated using the position and momentum vectors of the object as a whole. In contrast, internal angular momentum describes the angular momentum of individual elements within the object, represented as a vector field. The conversion between bulk and internal angular momentum occurs when external forces or motions, such as moving a container of fluid, disturb the internal structure, causing changes in the angular momentum distribution. This interaction illustrates how the motion of the entire system can affect the internal dynamics. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing fluid behavior and angular momentum in transport phenomena.
dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
According to the book "transport phenomena" by Lightfoot, Byron and Stewart if you take the cross product of the equation of motion (for very small element of fluid) and the position vector ##r## you get the equation of change of angular momentum. After some manipulation of vectors and tensors the equation can be written in such a way that a this term shows up:
$$ -[ \mathbf \epsilon \mathbf : \mathbf \tau ] $$

Where ## \mathbf \epsilon ## is a third-order tensor and ## \mathbf \tau ## is the stress-tensor.

Then the authors say:

If, on the other hand, ## \mathbf \tau## is asymmetric, then the last term describes the rate of conversion of bulk angular momentum to internal angular momentum.

What "bulk angular momentum" is? I don't understand, why there are two angular momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think bulk angular momentum is the angular momentum the object has as a whole, i.e. ## \vec L_b=\vec r_b \times \vec p_b ## where ##\vec r_b## and ##\vec p_b## are the position and momentum vectors of the object itself. Then the internal angular momentum has to be a vector field that tells you what is the angular momentum of a bit of the object at a particular point inside it.
 
  • Like
Likes dRic2
Thank you. I have some questions left then:

1) how exactly should I "imagine" (or calculate) the total angular momentum of stream of fluid?

2) Why is there a conversion from this two type of angular momentum ?
 
dRic2 said:
1) how exactly should I "imagine" (or calculate) the total angular momentum of stream of fluid?
I'm not quite sure. But I suppose if you're talking about ,e.g., a bucket of water, then the motion of that bucket will indicate the motion of the water inside it as a whole. Any motion that changes the shape of the water inside the bucket should be considered as internal motion because it changes the position of those bits of water relative to each other.
dRic2 said:
2) Why is there a conversion from this two type of angular momentum ?
Well, just take a glass of water and move it, that motion will cause disturbance in the surface of the water. You just converted some bulk momentum to some internal momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes dRic2
Thanks again. It think it is not very intuitive though (your explanation was clear, I just find it a bit strange)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top