Bullet Energy Transfer (Stopping Power)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an experiment designed to test and compare the "stopping power" of various defensive handgun loads, defined as a calculation of power relative to penetration distance. The proposed method involves firing rounds into a column of ballistic gel equipped with a scale to measure the downward force. Participants confirm that the concept of stopping power as a function of kinetic energy loss and deceleration is reasonable. The calculations involve using the formula for work, emphasizing the relationship between mass, acceleration, and distance traveled. Overall, the experimental setup is deemed sound for measuring stopping power.
cackermann
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working on setting up an experiment to test, calculate and compare the "stopping power" of various defensive handgun loads. This experiment assumes that "stopping power" is some sort of calculation like "power"/penetration distance, meaning that the higher the "power" and shorter the penetration distance the better.

The experiment I'm looking at would be a column of ballistic gel on a scale or some such device that will chart the downward force throughout the experiment, and then fire the round straight down into the gel.

So what I'm wondering is: first, does my concept of "stopping power" seem reasonable; second, what would you guys recommend as the best way to measure/calculate the "power" of the round; third, am I going about this all wrong or does the experiment setup seem reasonable?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your stopping power looks like force.

work = mass * acceleration * distance travelled

so the bullet comes in with X amount of kinetic energy and loses it all traveling some distance Y so that the stopping force on it was mass* deceleration that occurred.
 
jedishrfu said:
your stopping power looks like force.

work = mass * acceleration * distance travelled

so the bullet comes in with X amount of kinetic energy and loses it all traveling some distance Y so that the stopping force on it was mass* deceleration that occurred.

Outstanding, thank you. This makes total sense.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top