C = 299 792 458 m/s and uncertainty

  • Thread starter Thread starter DonnieD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
The speed of light, c, is defined as 299,792,458 m/s with no uncertainty due to its definition based on the distance light travels in a specific time. This definition means that rather than measuring c, we are defining it, leading to its exactness. While quantum fluctuations exist, the distances involved in measuring c are large enough that these fluctuations can be disregarded. The meter is intrinsically linked to the speed of light, reinforcing that c is a constant in this context. Therefore, the concept of measuring c as variable does not apply under the current definitions.
DonnieD
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
c is 299 792 458 m/s without uncertainty? doesn't work the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for fotons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The distances typically involved in measuring c are sufficently big that quantum fluctuations are ignored.

Also, the length of 1m is defined by the distance light travels in a certain amount of time. Because of this definition, we're effectively defining light's speed, not measuring it, so it is exact.
 
AlphaNumeric said:
Also, the length of 1m is defined by the distance light travels in a certain amount of time. Because of this definition, we're effectively defining light's speed, not measuring it, so it is exact.
we define 1m, but we must still measure in how much time light crosses 1m; we measured c but it can be less or more, right?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top