Cal Poly Pomona or UCLA for Aerospace Engineering?

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between Cal Poly Pomona and UCLA for Aerospace Engineering involves weighing the reputation and potential job prospects associated with each institution. A degree from UCLA is perceived to carry more weight in the job market compared to Cal Poly Pomona, similar to the difference between prestigious and less-known universities. While both schools can provide a solid education, the name recognition of UCLA may facilitate easier access to job opportunities. However, it's important to consider the financial implications of attending a more prestigious school, especially if debt is a concern. Ultimately, the decision should balance the perceived value of the degree with the quality of education and personal financial situation.
TimmyJ1203
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm trying to decide between Cal Poly Pomona and UCLA for Aerospace Engineering. I'm wondering specifically about classroom dynamics and professor-student relationships. I'm ready to transfer and I have already been admitted into both universities. Any information and advice is helpful! Feel free to ask me personal questions if you need some more information about me to tailor your response.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not having any personal experience with either of the schools, I can tell you that a degree from UCLA will go much much further than one from Cal Poly Pomona. It's kind of like asking, "Should I go to Princeton or Oklahoma State?" Strictly speaking, Oklahoma State isn't a bad school, and you very well may get a great education there, but from a practical standpoint, when you go to look for jobs, is the employer going to linger over the resume with "Princeton, GPA: 3.5" at the top, or "Oklahoma State University, GPA: 4.0?" Plenty of people (probably on this forum) will tell you that they've met real idiots from Ivy League schools, and geniuses without high school degrees, and this very well may be true, but I guarantee you more of the Ivy Leaguers are gainfully employed than the high school dropouts. It's a sad/practical fact of life.
 
I agree with TeethWhitener, a fancy name will at least make it easier for you to get your first job. And sometimes that is all ( or much of what) you need to succeed. But you need to measure that against the debt you will end up with after graduation.
 
Money is not an issue - I have worked enough to pay my way through college (being married young also helps).

I can see what you two are saying, and sadly, I do agree. I would like for my choice to strictly involve the quality of education I would receive, but I guess that that is also highly subjective.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top