Calc 2 Finding volume of wedge

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a wedge by integrating the area of vertical cross sections, referencing a provided sketch. The user has derived the base length function b(x) using similar triangles but is struggling to find the height function h(x). There is a debate about whether h(x) should represent the height of the triangular cross-section or the height of the tetrahedron over a point in the xy-plane. Participants emphasize the importance of using known values to verify calculations and suggest that the user should apply the same method used for b(x) to determine h(x). The conversation highlights the need for understanding the relationships in the geometry to solve the problem effectively.
dorangospecie
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Sketch: http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/6479/6219ek4.gif

Find the volume of the wedge in figure (A) in above sketch by integrating the area of vertical cross sections.

This is what I have so far:

b(x) = length of base of triangle at position x
h(x) = height of triangle at position x

For b(x) - use similar triangles
8/6 = (8-x)/b(x)
b(x)=3/4(8-x)

How then we would find the h(x) and solve the actual problem? Can anyone please help me out??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that height of the plane is also dependent on y
so should be h(x,y).

Find the plane equation. z = ax+by+c and so you know the height.
 
Can you please refer to the sketch and tell me the actual numbers used? I am really trying to figure it out, but I genuinely can't.
 
rootX said:
Note that height of the plane is also dependent on y.
I thought he was defining h(x) to be the height of the triangular cross-section -- not the height of the tetrahedron OABC over a point in the xy plane.
 
Last edited:
dorangospecie said:
Can you please refer to the sketch and tell me the actual numbers used? I am really trying to figure it out, but I genuinely can't.
If we tell you the actual numbers used, then you won't learn how to figure things out, right? How does one normally go about trying to find the value of unknown quantities?


Of course, there's more than one way to solve a problem -- your apprach seems perfectly reasonable. Your formula for b(x) looks correct. I made a sanity check by plugging in two known values (x=0 and x=8) to see if it gives the right answer. (Did you remember to make that check?)

I'm confused as to why you aren't using the exact same method to find h(x).
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K