[Calc 3] Gauss' Law for Elecricity over a hemisphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on applying Gauss' Law for electricity to calculate the total charge in a hemisphere defined by the electric field E=\left\langle 2xz^{2},2yx^{2},2zy^{2}\right\rangle. The user initially derived an expression for charge, q, resulting in units inconsistent with charge, specifically [R^{5}][\epsilon_o]. The error was identified in the substitution of z=\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}, which incorrectly assumed z's dependence on x and y throughout the hemisphere. The correct divergence of E should yield a total charge expression proportional to k\epsilon_0 R^5, where k is a constant ensuring proper unit consistency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law for electricity
  • Familiarity with multivariable calculus concepts, particularly divergence
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and their application in integration
  • Basic principles of electric fields and charge units
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Gauss' Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Learn about divergence in vector calculus and its physical significance
  • Study the conversion between rectangular and spherical coordinates in calculus
  • Explore the implications of unit consistency in physics problems, particularly in electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics and applied mathematics, particularly those studying electromagnetism and multivariable calculus, will benefit from this discussion.

mjdiaz89
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Thank you very much for takign the time to help me out. This is an applied calculus 3 (multivariable calc) level problem. I have an answer, but it is nonsensical as the units are not in accordance with units of charge, C.

Homework Statement


Instructions: Use Gauss' Law for electricity and the relationship [tex]q=\int\int\int_{Q} \rho dV[/tex].

Question: For [tex]E=\left\langle 2xz^{2},2yx^2,2zy^2\right\rangle[/tex], find the total charge in the hemisphere [tex]z=\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}[/tex].

Homework Equations


[tex]\nabla \bullet E=\rho/\epsilon_{o}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Finding the divergence of E:
[tex]\nabla \bullet E = \frac{\partial 2xz^{2}}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial 2yx^{2}}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial 2zy^{2}}{\partial z}[/tex]
Subsituting [tex]z=\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}[/tex] in the partial of x as z is a function of x:
[tex]= \frac{\partial 2x(R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2})}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial 2yx^{2}}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial 2zy^{2}}{\partial z}[/tex]
Yeilds:
[tex]\nabla \bullet E = 2(R^{2}-2x^{2})[/tex]

Now, this means that [tex]\rho = 2 \epsilon_o (R^{2}-2x^{2})[/tex]

Using the relation [tex]q=\int\int\int_{Q} \rho dV[/tex]:
and setting up the region of integration:
[tex]q = 2 \epsilon_o \int^{R}_{-R} \int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}} \int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}_{0}(R^{2}-2^{2}) dz dy dx[/tex]

Seeing spherical symmetry, a conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates will be convenient. *NOTE: My book and teacher use phi to indicate the angle from the z-axis and theta as the angle from the x-axis; like this: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalCoordinates.html * :
[tex]R^{2} - x^{2} = \rho^{2} - (\rho sin\phi cos\theta)^{2}[/tex]

Switching limits of integration and substituting [tex]\rho dV[/tex]

[tex]q = 2 \epsilon_o \int^{2\pi}_{0} \int^{\pi/2}_{0} \int^{R}_{0} \rho^{2} sin\phi (\rho^{2} - (\rho sin\phi cos\theta)^{2}) d\rho d\phi d\theta[/tex]
Distributing and integrating [tex]d\rhp[/tex]
[tex]q = 2 \epsilon_o \int^{2\pi}_{0} \int^{\pi/2}_{0} [\rho^{5}/5sin\phi - 2\rho^{5}/5sin^{3}\phi cos^{2}\theta]|^{R}_{0} d\phi d\theta[/tex]

After integrating wrt [tex]d\rho[/tex] and moving R^5 outside of the iterated integrals, the iterated integral remains as (Notice the weird R^5 units!):
[tex]q = 2/5 R^{5} \epsilon_o \int^{2\pi}_{0} \int^{\pi/2}_{0} [sin\phi - 2sin^{3}\phi cos^{2}\theta] d\phi d\theta[/tex]

Once all the trigonometric integrations are done (which is just as long as the work up to this point), my finals answer is
[tex]\frac{4}{15} \pi R^{5} \epsilon_o[/tex]

The units of this answer are [tex][R^{5}][\epsilon_o] = m^{5} * \frac{C^{2}}{Nm^{2}}\neq C[/tex]

Im sure there is an error I made as this is a law. However, my teacher was unable to find my error after visiting him in his office. I have been thinking about this problem for a few days now and ...well... I am still without a sensical answer. Any help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mjdiaz89 said:
Question: For [tex]E=\left\langle 2xz^{2},2yx^2,2zy^2\right\rangle[/tex], find the total charge in the hemisphere [tex]z=\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}[/tex].

You should take note here that for E to represent an actual electric field, it must have units of N/C. The only way this can happen is if you assume (sort of hand-wavingly) that there is some constant [tex]k=1 \frac{\text{N}}{\text{m}^3\text{C}}[/tex] multiplying this expression. If you were to assume this, then when you found your answer to be proportional to [tex]\epsilon_0 R^5[/tex], you would have that it is actually proportional to [tex]k\epsilon_0 R^5[/tex] which would give you the correct units of charge. However, since this is a math course and not a physics course I doubt they expect you to correct the units of E in this manner.

There is a mistake on your part though:

[tex]\nabla \bullet E = \frac{\partial 2xz^{2}}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial 2yx^{2}}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial 2zy^{2}}{\partial z}[/tex]
Subsituting [tex]z=\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}[/tex] in the partial of x as z is a function of x:

When you do this substitution, you are effectively assuming that [tex]z=\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}[/tex] everywhere in the hemisphere; but that is only true on the surface of the hemisphere. At a general point in the hemisphere, z is independent of x and y, so [tex]\frac{\partial }{\partial x} (2xz^2)=2z^2[/tex] and the divergence of E becomes [tex]2z^2+2x^2+2y^2=2\rho^2[/tex].
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K