Calc. field gradient of Stern-Gerlach magnet

Bacat
Messages
149
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



From Townsend "Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics", problem 1.1:

"Determine the field gradient of a 50-cm long Stern-Gerlach magnet that would produce a 1 mm separation at the detector between spin-up and spin-down silver atoms that are emitted from an oven at T=1500K. Assume the detector is 50 cm from the magnet. Note...the emitted atoms have average kinetic energy 2kT. The magnetic dipole moment of the silver atom is due to the intrinsic spin of a single electron.

Use Gaussian units.

Homework Equations



F=ma

F_z=\mu_z \del B

The Attempt at a Solution



Deriving an equation:

Assume the electron is moving in the x+ direction towards the detector, and that it is deflected in the \pm z direction. It feels a force F_z=\mu_z \del B for a time t=\frac{d_1}{v} where d1 is the length of the magnet along the x-axis.

Using Newton's laws, we can derive the acceleration, velocity, and thus displacement of the particle:

a_z=\frac{\mu_z \nabla B}{M} where M is the mass of a silver atom.

v_z = a_z t=\frac{\mu_z \nabla B d_1}{M v} where v is the magnitude of the total velocity of the atom and v_z is the velocity in the z-axis direction.

s_z^\prime=\frac{a_z t^2}{2}=\frac{\mu_z \nabla B d_1^2}{2Mv}

s_z=\frac{v_z d_z}{v}+s_z^\prime=\mu_z (\nabla B) (\frac{d_1^2 + 2d_1 d_2}{2Mv^2}) where s_z is the total deflection in the z-axis direction at the detector.

Solving the average kinetic energy for velocity...

2kT=\frac{Mv^2}{2} \implies v^2=\frac{4kT}{M}

Now we can solve...

s_z=\frac{\mu_z \nabla B (d_1^2 + 2d_1 d_2)}{2Mv}=\frac{\mu_z \nabla B (d_1^2 + 2d_1 d_2)}{2M(\frac{4kT}{M})}=\frac{\mu_z \nabla B (d_1^2 + 2d_1 d_2)}{8kT}

\therefore \nabla B=\frac{8kT s_z}{u_z (d_1^2 + 2d_1 d_2)}

Here is my problem...

I understand that \nabla B means to differentiate B according to the rules of vector calculus, but I'm not sure how to solve this equation for B as a number.

Do I need to integrate both sides? If so, with respect to what? Space? 3D space or just 1D space?

I can plug in all the numbers on the right hand sand, but I'm not sure what to do with it after that.

All help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential energy of a dipole μ in a magnetic field is

U = - \vec{\mu}\cdot \vec{B}

The force on this dipole is

\vec{F}=-\vec{\nabla}U=+\vec{\nabla}(\vec{\mu}\cdot \vec{B})

After applying some vector identities and exploiting the symmetry of the design, one ends up with the product of the magnetic moment and field gradient:

\vec{F}=F_{z}\hat{k}=\mu \frac{\partial B_{z}}{\partial z}

As always, μ takes the two allowed magnetic moment values

\mu=\pm\frac{e\hbar}{2m}

Start from there.
 
Thanks for the response.

I realized this morning that the problem is asking for the "field gradient" which actually is \nabla B, so I don't need to isolate B. I have the formula for the answer there and I just need to plug in the values.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top