Calculate a: Dist. b/w Lens Positions for 40 cm Object-Image Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter matt85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance between two positions of a converging lens that forms a sharp image for a fixed object-image distance of 40 cm. The thin lens formula, 1/f = 1/o + 1/i, is used to derive the relationship between object distance (o) and image distance (i). The user seeks clarification on how to apply the formula correctly, noting that switching the object and image distances leads to another valid lens position. The conversation also humorously touches on mechanical advantages in unrelated contexts. Ultimately, the goal is to determine the distance 'a' between the two lens positions.
matt85
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
The distance between an object and its image is fixed at 40.0 cm. A converging lens of focal length f = 3.62 cm forms a sharp image for two positions of the lens. What is the distance a between these two positions?

Determine:

The distance between these two positions a = ____cm

Could someone help me with the formula i want to be using?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thin lens formula gives
\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{o}+\frac{1}{i}
with i the image distance and o the object distance. Now say you find a position between the object and fixed screen (image position) such that you get a sharp image on the screen. The object image is now o and the image distance i while the sum of these two being 40 cm. But according to the formula if you make the object distance i the image distance should be o! Which gives you the other position of the lens where you should get a sharp image on the screen. In the second case the object distance will therefore be i and the image distance will be o.
 
Last edited:
I would guess that with a mech advantage of 2 you would have problems lifting your lecturer! Three would give you a fighting chance!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top