Calculate Efficiency of Particle Production

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Derive the efficiency for production of a particle of rest mass m made by colliding a 'bullet' particle of mass M with a stationary target particle mass N.



Homework Equations



ans is k^-1 =1 + (m+2M)/2N


The Attempt at a Solution



<br /> \bf{P_1} + \bf{P_2} = \bf{P}<br />

<br /> \bf{P}^2 = \bf{P_1}^2 + \bf{P_2}^2 + 2\bf{P_1}\cdot \bf{P_2}<br />

<br /> \bf{P_1}\cdot \bf{P_2} = c^2 M N \gamma(v)<br />

<br /> \bf{P}^2 = m^2 c^2 - p^2<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nusc said:

The Attempt at a Solution



<br /> \bf{P_1} + \bf{P_2} = \bf{P}<br />

<br /> \bf{P}^2 = \bf{P_1}^2 + \bf{P_2}^2 + 2\bf{P_1}\cdot \bf{P_2}<br />

<br /> \bf{P_1}\cdot \bf{P_2} = c^2 M N \gamma(v)<br />

<br /> \bf{P}^2 = m^2 c^2 - p^2<br />

All you've done here is write down a bunch of equations (none of which has the definition of efficiency in it) without defining any of the variables you are using (except for the ones given in the problem statement), telling us why these equations are true (for example, "Conservation of momentum tells us..."), or even telling us which reference frame you are working in, or where you are stuck...Do you really expect people to able to provide help under these circumstances?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top