Calculate Energy Needed to Move 1000lb Vehicle at 55mph for 1hr

  • Thread starter Thread starter lex_ee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Energy
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the energy needed to move a 1000lb vehicle at 55mph for one hour, it is essential to understand that if there are no drag or friction forces, no additional energy is required to maintain that speed. The kinetic energy can be calculated using the formula 1/2*m*v^2, but time does not factor into the energy needed to maintain constant velocity without external forces. If drag is considered, the work done is proportional to v^3 and can be approximated to about 3 x 10^8 J for a vehicle traveling at 55 mph for one hour. Ultimately, without drag or friction, the vehicle requires no energy to sustain its speed once it has reached 55 mph.
lex_ee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'd like to calculate the energy required to move a 1000lb vehicle at 55mph for 1hr. I'm looking for a simple calculation, nothing with drag, friction or acceleration is required

I expect this to be pretty simple, 1/2*m*v^2, to solve for the Kinetic Energy of the vehicle. However, how does 'time' come into play, to determine the energy needed over time?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there is no drag or friction, once your car is going 55 mph it will need no energy to keep going at that speed.
 
lex_ee said:
I'd like to calculate the energy required to move a 1000lb vehicle at 55mph for 1hr. I'm looking for a simple calculation, nothing with drag, friction or acceleration is required

I expect this to be pretty simple, 1/2*m*v^2, to solve for the Kinetic Energy of the vehicle. However, how does 'time' come into play, to determine the energy needed over time?

Thanks
If there are no non-conservative forces acting on the car, then maintaining a constant velocity won't take any energy.
Taking drag into account is relatively simple actually.
Use the work-energy theorem W=\Delta E and the definition of work
W=\int_a^b \vec F \cdot \vec{dx}.
The drag equation tells us that F_d=-\frac{1}{2}\rho A C_d v^2. You can look this up on wikipedia for the details.
Now you told us that the velocity needed to be a constant we can pull it out of the work integral and get (evaluating between x=0 and x=x),
W=\frac{1}{2}\rho A C_d v^2 x
where x is the total distance traveled.
Now v=\frac{dx}{dt} and with v constant, x=vt and so we see the total work done is proportional to v^3,
W=\frac{1}{2}\rho A C_d v^3 t.
For a reasonable car and under normal atmospheric conditions,
C_dA\approx 7 m^2,
\rho\approx 1.2 kg/m^3.
So the work done after an amount of time t is numerically approximately (for normal cars, see the ACd product for cars on wikipedia),
W\approx 5v^3t.
For a car going 55 mph for 3600 s, the work is approximately 3 10^8 J. That's quite a bit of energy!
Hope that helps.
 
mathman said:
If there is no drag or friction, once your car is going 55 mph it will need no energy to keep going at that speed.

I agree. lex_ee, your result will be overly-simplistic. You can find dynamometer data online for most cars. The data will give you rpms (or mph) and power in a more realistic setting--if you are given rpms, you will need appropriate car specs and data to convert to mph:
http://www.type2.com/library/misc/calcspd.htm

The power can then be converted into the quantity that you desire.
 
lex_ee said:
I'd like to calculate the energy required to move a 1000lb vehicle at 55mph for 1hr. I'm looking for a simple calculation, nothing with drag, friction or acceleration is required

I expect this to be pretty simple, 1/2*m*v^2, to solve for the Kinetic Energy of the vehicle. However, how does 'time' come into play, to determine the energy needed over time?

Thanks

By Newton's first law once the car is moving at 55mph you will not need to add any more energy as you will not be accelerating it any more.

K=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}

\Delta{K} = \frac{1}{2}m(\Delta{v})^{2} as \frac{dm}{dt} is constant

\approx\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1000}{2.2})(55*1.6)^{2}

\approx\1.76 * 10^{6} J
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top