Calculate forces acting on liquid film

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the forces acting on a liquid film in equilibrium between two walls, primarily focusing on gravity, adhesive forces, and surface tension. Gravity exerts a downward force that varies across the film due to its non-uniform shape. The upward adhesive force at the walls and the surface tension at the liquid-air interface also play crucial roles in counteracting gravity. The geometry of the film, including its orientation and curvature, significantly affects these forces, especially when considering different wetting scenarios. Understanding these interactions is essential for accurately determining the force vectors acting on the liquid film.
MarcGyongyosi
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Dear all fellow physicists,

I am struggling with the following fluid mechanics problem: considering a liquid film in an "equilibrium" position between two plane walls, I am trying to define the forces acting on the liquid.

Most importantly, gravity is pulling down on the liquid with Fg = m* g. Since the shape of the film is not uniform, this force's magnitude (slightly) varies across the film.

Furthermore, we have an adhesive force component which acts upward, sort of holding the liquid film at the walls and we have surface tension at the liquid-air interface.

My problem is with regard to the forces acting against gravity. How can I calculate them? Knowing surface tension and the wetting angle, can I define them in some way or another, based on the curvatures of the top and bottom surface of the liquid film? Like, what would the individual force vectors' magnitudes be, based on liquid properties and curvatures of the surfaces?

Looking forward to your replies,

Marc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is available to push on the particles of the film?
i.e. what is it sitting on? Is there anything above or below the film or is it in vacuum?
 
MarcGyongyosi said:
I am struggling with the following fluid mechanics problem: considering a liquid film in an "equilibrium" position between two plane walls, I am trying to define the forces acting on the liquid.

<snip>

I am having trouble understanding the geometry- what is the orientation of the film with respect to gravity? For now, I'll assume the walls are vertical (the film is horizontal) and the film is something like a soap film with air reserviours on either side, so the film forms a shape like a catenary in cross-section.

First- this problem is not trivial. There are two free surfaces and at least three relevant forces- gravity, any pressure difference between the reservoirs, and wetting at the three-phase contact line. Lots of different things can happen- even if gravity is 'off' and the pressure difference is zero, if the soapy water completely wets the wall, the film will thin and break. In the opposite case- complete hydrophobic interactions, the film will detach from the wall. In general, the evolution and equilibrium shape can be obtained by the 'shooting method':

ftp://orthodox-hub.ru/books/_%D4%E8%E7%E8%EA%E0_%CC%E0%F2%E5%EC%E0%F2%E8%EA%E0/RevModPhys/RevModPhys%201984-2008/root/data/RevModPhys%201984-2008/pdf/RMP/v069/RMP_v069_p0931.pdf (starting at pg. 957)

Good luck...
 
... and that's just assuming the film in question is a soap film.
The type of film has not been stated - it could be oil on water with air above for all we know.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top