Calculate Height of Freely Falling Object - 30m in 1.5s

  • Thread starter Thread starter kash25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Free fall
AI Thread Summary
A freely falling object takes 1.50 seconds to travel the last 30.0 meters before impact, prompting a discussion on calculating the height from which it fell. The confusion arises regarding whether the object was initially thrown upward, impacting the calculations. Participants suggest finding the velocity at 30 meters above the ground and using it to determine the initial height. A key error identified is the incorrect assumption that the impact velocity is zero, which leads to discrepancies in calculations. Accurate application of kinematic equations is essential for resolving the height of the fall.
kash25
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A freely falling object requires 1.50 s to travel the last 30.0 m before it hits the ground. From what height above the ground did it fall?


I have been working on this for a while and seem to be going wrong somewhere.
I am unclear as to how free fall is meant here. I know that it need not refer to an object that is simply falling and can refer to any object that is experiencing gravity alone. How can I tell whether this object was thrown upward before falling? Does it make a difference?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Find the velocity of the object when it is 30m above the ground. Then use this to find out the height above the 30m where the velocity was 0. Just use formulas where you have the most knowns and fewest unknowns.
 
i was doing that but i got different velocities depending on which equation i used...:
velocity(Average)=(vsub30m + vsubground)/2
20 = vsub30m/2
vsub30m=40m/s
if i do the same thing with the equation deltaX = vsub30m*t + .5at^2,
i get something like 12.6 for vsub30m..
where am i going wrong?
 
Hi kash25,

kash25 said:
i was doing that but i got different velocities depending on which equation i used...:
velocity(Average)=(vsub30m + vsubground)/2
20 = vsub30m/2

This line is not right. You have assumed that vsubground=0; however, vsubground is the impact velocity (the velocity right before it touches the ground) and so is not zero.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top