Calculate Horn Frequency Decay Time in Seconds

  • Thread starter Thread starter 05holtel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time for the frequency of a car's horn to decrease by 5%, the initial frequency is 451 Hz and the car accelerates at 0.64 m/s². The observer must consider both the time it takes for the car to reach a certain speed and the time for sound to travel from the car to the observer. The calculated speed of the car after 28 seconds is 17.89 m/s, but this does not account for the distance sound must travel. The total time must include the time for sound to reach the observer after the car has moved away, indicating a need for further calculations.
05holtel
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




While blowing its horn of frequency 451 Hz, a car accelerates at 0.64 m/s2.

The car starts from rest by your side and moves away.

How long will it take for the frequency you hear to decrease by 5%?

Hint: Do not forget to include the time it will take for sound to reach you.

Give your answer in s, and to three significant figures.

Only answer in numerical values, no units.

Homework Equations



speed of sound in air is 340 m/s

The Attempt at a Solution




fsource = fo (1/(1+vsource/c))

0.95 = (1/(1+vsource/c))

vsourve = 17.89m/s

V= v0 +at
t= 17.89/0.64
t = 28.0 seconds


This is wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably just need to take into account the time it takes for sound to reach the observer. If the time you got is right, then at 28.0s the car would have traveled some distance that sound would have to cover in some time to get to the observer.
 
OK. I am not sure how to account for this. What equation would i use?

Thanks alot
 
The car traveled a distance x = .5at2 from the observer, in which t = 28.0s. This would mean that for the sound carrying the relative frequency to get to the observer, it would have to travel through this distance to get to the observer. Your total time would take this into account.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top