Calculate integral using Gauss theorem

mahler1
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement .

Let
##D =\left\{\left(x,y\right)\ \in\ {\mathbb R}^{2}: x^{2} + y^{2} \leq 1\right\}## and let ##{\rm f}:D \to {\mathbb R}## defined as
##{\rm f}\left(x,y\right)
= \left(1 - x^{2} -y^{2}\right)\exp\left(x^{4}y^{10}\right)##.
Consider the surface ##S## given by the graph of ##{\rm f}## restricted to ##D##, oriented with the exterior normal vector. Let ##G## be the vector field
##G:{\mathbb R}^{3} \to {\mathbb R}^{3}## given by

##G(x,y,z) = \left(\,-y,\, x,\, x^{2} + y^{2}\,\right)\,,\qquad\mbox{Calculate}\ \int_{S} G\cdot dS##


The attempt at a solution.

I am having a hard time trying to visualize the surface ##S##.

One possibility is to use Gauss theorem, which says that if ##W## is an elementary symmetric region in space where ##\partial W## is a closed oriented surface and ##F## is a function of class ##C^1##, then

##\iiint_w (divF).dV=\iint_{\partial W} F.dS##.

I've calculated the divergence of ##G## and it gives ##0##. If I could find a region ##W## bounded by ##S##, then

##0=\iiint_w (divG).dV=\iint_{\partial W} G.dS=\int_S G.dS##

Another doubt that I have is: how do I know ##S## is a closed surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mahler1 said:
Homework Statement .

Let
##D =\left\{\left(x,y\right)\ \in\ {\mathbb R}^{2}: x^{2} + y^{2} \leq 1\right\}## and let ##{\rm f}:D \to {\mathbb R}## defined as
##{\rm f}\left(x,y\right)
= \left(1 - x^{2} -y^{2}\right)\exp\left(x^{4}y^{10}\right)##.
Consider the surface ##S## given by the graph of ##{\rm f}## restricted to ##D##, oriented with the exterior normal vector. Let ##G## be the vector field
##G:{\mathbb R}^{3} \to {\mathbb R}^{3}## given by

##G(x,y,z) = \left(\,-y,\, x,\, x^{2} + y^{2}\,\right)\,,\qquad\mbox{Calculate}\ \int_{S} G\cdot dS##.

The attempt at a solution.

I am having a hard time trying to visualize the surface ##S##.

One possibility is to use Gauss theorem, which says that if ##W## is an elementary symmetric region in space where ##\partial W## is a closed oriented surface and ##F## is a function of class ##C^1##, then

##\iiint_w (divF).dV=\iint_{\partial W} F.dS##.

I've calculated the divergence of ##G## and it gives ##0##. If I could find a region ##W## bounded by ##S##, then

##0=\iiint_w (divG).dV=\iint_{\partial W} G.dS=\int_S G.dS##

Another doubt that I have is: how do I know ##S## is a closed surface?

It isn't a closed surface. And as such, the "exterior" normal doesn't make sense. Perhaps you mean the upward directed normal. Your surface is defined on the domain ##D:~x^2+y^2\le 1##. As a hint, what does your ##f(x,y)## look like on the boundary of ##D##?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
LCKurtz said:
It isn't a closed surface. And as such, the "exterior" normal doesn't make sense. Perhaps you mean the upward directed normal. Your surface is defined on the domain ##D:~x^2+y^2\le 1##. As a hint, what does your ##f(x,y)## look like on the boundary of ##D##?

Yes, I've meant the upward directed normal, sorry, I am translating from spanish to english and sometimes I pick the wrong words. Hmm, ##f(x,y)=0## on the boundary of ##D##, and this tells me...? (I need a little more push).
 
Last edited:
mahler1 said:
Yes, I've meant the upward directed normal, sorry, I am translating from spanish to english and sometimes I pick the wrong words. Hmm, ##f(x,y)=0## in the boundary of ##D##, and this tells me...? (I need a little more push).

It tells you that your open surface and your domain ##D## share the same boundary. So if you add the domain ##D## to your picture, you would have a closed surface. And that buys you ...
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top