Calculate Magnitude of Positive Charge on Two Conducting Spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jatsix30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity
AI Thread Summary
Two conducting spheres with opposite charges attract each other with a force of 0.162N when separated by 0.3m. After being connected by a wire, they repel each other with a force of 0.041N. The positive charge on one sphere is larger than the negative charge on the other. Charge distribution occurs equally after they touch, leading to equal charges on both spheres post-connection. The calculated positive charge is approximately 6.4 x 10^-7 C.
Jatsix30
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Two conducting spheres have identical radii. Initially they have charges of opposite sign and unequal magnitudes with the magnitude of the positive charge larger than the magnitude of the negative charge. They attract each other with a force of 0.162N when separated by 0.3m. The spheres are suddenly connected by a thin conducting wire, which is then removed. Note the spheres repel each other with a force of 0.041. What is the magnitude of the postive charge? Answer in units of C.

I tried using the formula Fe=(kq1q2)/(d squared) but i was unsuccessful... :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the right idea, you know before the wire:
Fe=(k*qb1*qb2)/(d^2) = -0.162N
qb1 is the charge on sphere one before the thin wire is attached. Sphere one will also be the posatively charge sphere. I am using negative force to mean attractive.
After the thin wire is attached:
Fe=(k*qa1*qa2)/(d^2) = 0.041.

After the sphere touch they equaly distribute the charge over both spheres so.
(qb1+qb2)/2 = qa1 = qa2

Does the problem make more sense now?
 
It's more clear to me how to do this problem...
After the thin wire attached, I calculated that qa1=qa2=6.4 times 10^-7.
Then, I assume you can use math to calculate qab, right? I'm not sure how though, as my math skills aren't that good either.
Thanks for helping!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top