Calculate Molar Mass of Gas: 0.6536 g/L @ 37C & 787 torr

  • Thread starter Thread starter chemistry4all
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Mass
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the molar mass of a gas with a density of 0.6536 g/L at 37°C and 787 torr, the ideal gas law (PV = nRT) was applied, resulting in a calculated molar mass of approximately 16.05 g/mol. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the next steps after finding the molar mass. Participants suggest that the molecular formula of the gas might be CH4, as it closely matches the calculated molar mass. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between density, temperature, pressure, and molar mass in gas calculations. Overall, the thread focuses on the calculation process and identifying the molecular formula based on the derived molar mass.
chemistry4all
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Calculate the molar mass of a gas that has a density of 0.6536 g/L at 37C and 787 torr. What do you think the?

My attempt:

I used n= PV/RT and calculated the number of moles to be 16.0548g/mol.

The second part is where I am confused. Anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


chemistry4all said:
Calculate the molar mass of a gas that has a density of 0.6536 g/L at 37C and 787 torr. What do you think the?

My attempt:

I used n= PV/RT and calculated the number of moles to be 16.0548g/mol.

The second part is where I am confused. Anyone help?

Second part? Eh?
 


oops didnt finish the last sentence. It is "What do you think you think the molecular formula of the gas is?


I think its CH4 because that's the only molecule I can find that has a MM close to 16g.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top