Calculate Normal Force: Crate & Person on Floor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the normal forces acting on a crate and a person standing on it. The crate has a mass of 41 kg and the person weighs 67 kg, leading to a calculated normal force of 1080 N from the floor on the crate and 670 N from the crate on the person. Participants suggest drawing force diagrams and summing forces for clarity. There's a debate about using 10 m/s² versus the more accurate 9.8 m/s² for gravitational acceleration, with a consensus that answers should reflect the precision of the values used. The importance of specifying units in calculations is also emphasized.
Pizza Dave
Messages
1
Reaction score
1

Please help with below. is it correct?

A 41 kg crate rests on a horizontal floor and a 67kg person is standing on the crate.

a. determine the magnitude of the normal force the floor exerts on the crate

b. determine the magnitude of the normal force that the crate exerts on the person

Homework Equations



(m1+m2)G
M2(G) [/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



a. 1080
b. 670 [/B]
 
  • Like
Likes carl_loves_math
Physics news on Phys.org
Try drawing a force diagram for both the person on the crate and the crate and try summing your forces for each individually. The answers should become clear!Also, this belongs in introductory physics.
 
AlephNumbers, this was an impertinent response.

Pizza Dave, you calculated this answer correctly, but it looks like you substituted 10 for the force of gravity instead of the actual value of 9.8. This may help your answers be more accurate in the future!
 
Pizza Dave said:
a. 1080
b. 670
You should always specify units (unless instructed otherwise).
carl_loves_math said:
it looks like you substituted 10 for the force of gravity instead of the actual value of 9.8.
Both values are just approximations. Often students are told to use 10 ms-2. On the other hand, if it is approximated to 10 then, logically, the answers should only be given to the same precision, e.g. 1100 N for (a).
And you mean gravitational acceleration, not force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top