Calculate Plane Acceleration from Pendulum Length & Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhenyazh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the plane's acceleration using the pendulum's behavior, it is essential to recognize that the pendulum's oscillation reflects the plane's acceleration. When the plane accelerates to the left, the pendulum moves to the right, indicating that its acceleration matches that of the plane. The discussion involves applying Newton's second law in both x and y directions, along with the relationship between the pendulum's length and the maximum displacement. A proposed method includes using the angular frequency derived from gravitational acceleration and the pendulum length. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the forces acting on the pendulum to determine the plane's acceleration accurately.
zhenyazh
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
A pendulum has a length L = 1.07 m. It hangs straight down in a jet plane about to take off The jet accelerates uniformly, and during that time, the pendulum oscillates about the equilibrium position to a maximum distance D = 0.370 m. Calculate the magnitude of the plane's acceleration.

so as i understand if the plane starts moving to the left, the pendulum is thrown to the right.
its acceleration is the acceleration of the plane.
the acceleration at the farthest point is a=-A*w^2*cos(wt).
where the cos is 1 A is either D or the angular distance and w is the ratio between the roots
of g and l.
but i am wrong.
where am i wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you are starting well by saying that the acceleration of the plane is same as the pendulum ..

mmm but I am not sure why you didnt take the easy way ..

as you are suggesting if the plane is moving to the left then the pendulum is moving to the right .. I made this figure :

http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/7069/78208931.jpg

I think with the information in the figure along with Newton`s 2nd law in the x- and y- directions you can get the acceleration .. does what i say make sense? .. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
762
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Back
Top