Calculate Planet Radius: Trig & No Calculator

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnsholto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet Radius
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the radius of the planet based on the observer's height and angle to the horizon, trigonometry is essential. The observer, positioned 100m above sea level, sees the horizon at an angle of 5mrad below the horizontal. By drawing a circle representing the planet and using right-angle triangles, the relationship between the radius and the observer's height can be established. The small angle approximation helps simplify the calculations, leading to an estimated radius of approximately 8,000,000 meters. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the trigonometric principles involved rather than relying solely on calculators.
johnsholto
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A person stands on a cliff overlooking the sea. He is 100m above the sea level and he observes the horizon to be 5mrad below the local horizontal.

How do you calculate the radius from this information without using a calculator? Trigonometry I am guessing, but I need a better hint.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Always draw the picture.

Place an origin O and draw a circle radius R about it. That's your planet.

The observer is at point A, a distance R+h from O - draw the line OA.
The point B, on the circle, is where the tangent to the circle also goes through point A.
The angle between BA and the tangent to OA (through A) is ##\alpha##.

In your case, h=100m and ##\alpha##=5mrad.
This will give you two right-angle triangles to work your trig on.
You may be able to make an approximation based on h<<R.
 
I tried it with:

AB^2 + R^2 = (R+100)^2

AB = (R+100)sinA

But i can't solve the equation without the calculator.
 
Why do you need to solve it without a calculator?
 
Punishment.

Alas, I just remembered small angle approximation.

cosA = 1-(A^2/2)

cosA = R/R+100

R ≈ 8000000

I did not enjoy this problem.
 
hehehe well done.
They get easier.

@hallsofivy: I suspect that it's part of the instructions in the homework - however: does not mean that a calculator cannot be used to figure out how to do it without a calculator.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top