Calculate resistivity of the material of the wire

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the resistivity of an iron wire with a current of 0.75A and a voltage of 1.5V, the resistance is first determined using R = V/I, resulting in 2Ω. The resistivity formula R = ρl/A is then applied, substituting the known values: length (5m) and area (2.5 x 10^-7 m²). The calculation leads to a resistivity of 1 x 10^-7 Ωm. The final answer is confirmed as correct by participants in the discussion.
looi76
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Calculate resistivity of the material of the wire

Question:
0.75A Current flows through an iron wire when a battery of 1.5V us connected across its ends. The length of the wire is 5m and Area is 2.5 \times 10^{-7} m^2. Calculate resistivity of the material of the wire.

Equation:
R = \frac{Pl}{A}

Attempt:
I = 0.75A \ , \ V = 1.5V \ , \ l = 5m \ , \ A = 2.5 \times 10^{-7} m^2

R = \frac{Pl}{A}

P = IV

P = 0.75 \times 1.5

P = 1.125

R = \frac{1.125 \times 5}{2.5 \times 10^{-7}}

R = 2.3 \times 10^7

Is my answer correct?:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have your P's mixed up :rolleyes:

The P here represents the resistivity of the material
looi76 said:
R = \frac{Pl}{A}
Whereas the P here represents the power dissapated by the wire.
looi76 said:
P = IV
 
Thanks Hootenanny!

I = 0.75A \ , \ V = 1.5V \ , \ l = 5m \ , \ A = 2.5 \times 10^{-7} m^2

R = \frac{V}{I} = \frac{1.5}{0.75} = 2\Omega

R = \frac{Pl}{A}

2\Omega = \frac{P \times 5}{2.5 \times 10^7 \Omega{m}}

P = \frac{2 \times 2.5 \times 10^{-7}}{5}

P = 1 \times 10^{-7} \Omega{m}

is this correct?:rolleyes:
 
looi76 said:
Thanks Hootenanny!

I = 0.75A \ , \ V = 1.5V \ , \ l = 5m \ , \ A = 2.5 \times 10^{-7} m^2

R = \frac{V}{I} = \frac{1.5}{0.75} = 2\Omega

R = \frac{Pl}{A}

2\Omega = \frac{P \times 5}{2.5 \times 10^7 \Omega{m}}

P = \frac{2 \times 2.5 \times 10^{-7}}{5}

P = 1 \times 10^{-7} \Omega{m}

is this correct?:rolleyes:

That's what I get :approve:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top