Calculate Reynolds Number for 0.3m Diameter Pipe Flow

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Reynolds number for a pipe with a 0.3m internal diameter carrying water at a specified flow rate. Participants are exploring the implications of their calculated Reynolds number on the nature of the flow.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to calculate the Reynolds number using the formula involving density, flow velocity, and viscosity. There are questions regarding the appropriateness of using the pipe diameter as the characteristic length and the accuracy of the flow speed derived from potential energy considerations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have reported similar results, indicating a level of agreement on the calculations. There is ongoing verification of the flow speed based on the height difference provided, and some have utilized online calculators to cross-check their results.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the potential for errors in their calculations, particularly concerning the flow speed and the assumptions made regarding the parameters used in the Reynolds number formula. There is also a lack of reference for typical Reynolds numbers in similar scenarios.

tomwilliam
Messages
142
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Estimate a reynolds number for a pipe of 0.3m internal diameter, carrying water at a rate of 71 m/s, and say what that says about the likely nature of the flow.


Homework Equations


Re = (density x L x velocity of flow)/coefficient of dynamic viscosity for water
Viscosity of water = 8.9 x 10^-4 kg/m s
density of water = 1000 kg/m^3

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I have produced a result of some 27 million, which seems excessive to me. Possible mistakes: I used the diameter of the pipe as L. Also, the flow speed is something I calculated in a previous question, so could potentially be wrong. The speed is just due to potential energy coming from a reservoir exactly 500m higher up, where pressure is atmospheric only.
Does anything sound wrong with this solution? I have no reference for typical reynolds numbers in these situations...
Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got a similar result.
 
Thanks - In that case I'd better check that I've got the right flow speed for a height difference of 500m and a diameter of 0.3m.
 
I just used one of those on-line RN calculators--I got 23.9 million which is close, esp in the world of Reynolds numbers--certainly the answer to the next question will be the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K