Calculate Smallest Distance Between Baby Parts with Ultrasound Pulses

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trail_Builder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the smallest distance between parts of a baby using ultrasound pulses. The ultrasound pulses are 3.5 microseconds long and travel 100mm in 70 microseconds. A key analogy compares the situation to two trucks turning around, illustrating that the distance between the two parts must be half the length of the pulse. The calculation involves determining the speed of the pulse and subsequently the pulse length, leading to the conclusion that the minimum distance is 0.0025 meters. The participants confirm the calculations and express satisfaction with the solution.
Trail_Builder
Messages
148
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the ultrasound pulses are 3.5 microseconds (is \mu the right symbol for "micro"?) long, and travel 100mm in 70 micro seconds, what is the smallest distance one part of a baby can be behind another if the reflections can just be told apart (dont get mixed together in time).

Homework Equations



v = f x wavelength maybe?

The Attempt at a Solution



I couldn't find out how to do it in the textbook

can someone please explain the theory behind it, and possibly leave the calculation to me?

thnx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll give an analogy which I think will help illustrate what's happening... suppose you have 2 trucks each of length L... they are driving side by side at the same speed. At some point the first truck turns around in the opposite direction... the second truck turns around at a distance X beyond the spot where the first truck turned around...

How long does the distance X have to be, so that no parts of the two trucks are side by side... meaning one truck is completely behind the other on the way back?
 
Last edited:
umm, 0.5L by any chance?

cant really work it out mathematically, but that's what it would seem right logically in my head. because as one of the trucks turns around, by the time one of the truck goes distance 0.5L to X the one that has turned around has gone back 0.5L right?
 
Trail_Builder said:
umm, 0.5L by any chance?

cant really work it out mathematically, but that's what it would seem right logically in my head. because as one of the trucks turns around, by the time one of the truck goes distance 0.5L to X the one that has turned around has gone back 0.5L right?

Yes, exactly right. Thinking of the pulses like trucks that turn around in the same way... the distance between the two parts of the baby has to be 0.5*length of the pulse. Can you calculate the length of the pulse?

Find the speed of the pulse first. Then you can get the length.
 
Last edited:
so speed would be 0.1/0.00007 m/s

distance = speed x time, so i take it the length of the pulse is 0.005, and the so the final answer will be 0.0025m?

thnx for the help buddy

...

just check the answers and I am right :D

thnx
 
Trail_Builder said:
so speed would be 0.1/0.00007 m/s

distance = speed x time, so i take it the length of the pulse is 0.005, and the so the final answer will be 0.0025m?

thnx for the help buddy

...

just check the answers and I am right :D

thnx

Cool! Good job! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top