barofsoap69 said:
Calculate the weight of the patient. Include definition(s), formula, correct number of significant digits and units of measurement in your answer. (4 marks)
The point about significant figures is that you should not give an answer with unjustified accuracy.
The answer is given to the same number as significant figures as the lowest number of figures given in the data.
So, if a box had a mass of 8 kg and the acceleration due to gravity is given as 9.81 m/s^2 then the weight of the box can only be given to ONE sig figure. Becaus the mass is only given to one figure.
If the box had a mass of 8.00kg you can give the answer to 3 sig figures
If the box had a mass of 8.000kg you can give the answer to 3 sig figures. Why only 3? Because the acceleration due to gravity is only given to 3 sig figures. You have to use the lowest number of sig figures from the data.
What if the box was 80 kg and acceleration is 9.81 m/s^2 ? The least number of sig figures is now two.
The weight is 80kg x 9.81m/s^2 = 784.8 N
You should write this as
A) 780 N (to two sig figures) (because mass is given to two sig figures)
or
B) 7.8 x 10^2 N (because mass is given to two sig figures)Both are correct (be sure
if you use method A, to write in brackets (as I have done) the number of sig figures so that the 0 obviously seen as not significant. I think (A) looks neater, for a final answer and less fussy than (B); but B is useful in calculations)
Sig figures are a constant source of pain; and sometimes counter intuitive and a headache.
If you measure an angle, to the nearest angle, with your protractor you can write
–1° (1 sig figure)
or
359° (3 sig figures).
both are correct, but one looks like it is 3 times more accurate than the other, which it is not! You would not be justified making 1° into 1.00°; nor rounding 359° to 400° (or 0°)! Both would be very wrong. You need to make an educated decision about what number is justified and say that in the answer.And
Generally, zeros AFTER a decimal point are significant. Zeroes BEFORE are not. However, it is not easy! If your instrument is correct to five decimal places, which is more "accurate":
1.00001 Amps is 6 sig figures
0.00001 Amps is 1 sig figure
you could - as far as I am concerned - be justifed in saying that both are as accurate as each other - as long as you explain why you think that.Be sure to put in your answer WHY you have used the number of significant figures.