Calculate that the proton and neutron in a deuteron

physics_fun
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
You can calculate that the proton and neutron in a deuteron spend quite some time so far away from each other, that they are outside each others force range. Why doesn't the deuteron break up? Is it because of the binding energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The binding energy is just the energy the one would have to put into the deuteron to separate the p and n. The nuclear force is responsible for binding the p and n.

I believe the probability that the p,n in a deuteron "spending quite some time so far away from each other, such that they are outside each others force range," is exceedingly small, if not nil. If that were the case, then some deuterons would spontaneously dissociate.
 
Maybe I didn't formulate it very clear, but what I mean is this:
http://www.shef.ac.uk/physics/teaching/phy303/303soltn1.html#sols2
(2nd solution)

So in this calculation it is about 64% of the time the case.
But I don't know why the deuteron doesn't dissociate...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
physics_fun said:
But I don't know why the deuteron doesn't dissociate...

Because the energy of a free p and n is greater than the energy of a deuteron.
 

Thread 'Toponium Discovered'

Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
View full post »

Thread 'Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions'

I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Mass for solving the nuclear energy level
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Can proton/neutron decay be avoided in some conditions?
Replies
3
Views
3K
B Why don't neutrons bind into large out of control masses?
Replies
28
Views
3K
I Why Can't We Construct a Particle Consisting Only of Neutrons?
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Nuclear Force Behavior: Confusing Isospin Dependence
Replies
11
Views
3K
B Can a hydrogen atom become a neutron?
Replies
5
Views
3K
I Why Doesn't Proton Decoupling Affect Hydrogen and Helium Formation?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Can Neutron-X Fusion Reactions Overcome the Repulsion Problem in Fusion Energy?
Replies
11
Views
2K
A Energy needed to convert a bound proton to a neutron?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Why is a deuteron an antisymmetric singlet in
Replies
4
Views
12K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top