Calculate the actual depth of the trout

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shaley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Depth
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the actual depth of a trout observed from a fishing boat. Sam estimates the trout's apparent depth at 2.0 meters, with her eyes positioned 1.0 meter above the water and viewing at a 45-degree angle. Using Snell's Law, the refractive indices of water and air are applied to determine the angle of incidence and the bending of light rays at the water's surface. Participants emphasize the importance of visualizing the scenario through diagrams to understand the light path and its refraction. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in mathematical representation and geometry to solve the problem effectively.
Shaley
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Sam is sitting in her fishing boat watching a trout swim below the surface. She guesses the apparent depth of the trout at 2.0m. She estimates that her eyes are about 1.0 m above the water's surface, and that the angle at which she's observing the trout is 45 degrees.

a) draw a diagram to show the ACTUAL depth of the trout and the path of light from the trout to Sam's eyes
b) Calculate the actual depth of the trout

MY WORK SO FAR:
ni=1.33 for water (the "i" stands or incident)
nR=1.00 for air (to 3 significant digits) (the "r" stands for refracted)

sinangle1=[(nR)(sinangleR)] divided by ni
=(1.00)(.707) divided by 1.33
=0.534
anglei=32.3degrees

I don't know where to go from here...please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you do what the question asks and draw a diagram of the light rays striking the fishermans eyes? What happens at the surface?

Is it bent towards or away from the fisherman? If you know that, it becomes a problem in geometry.
 
sorry, I still don't understand.please explain more.
 
denverdoc said:
Can you do what the question asks and draw a diagram of the light rays striking the fishermans eyes? What happens at the surface?

Is it bent towards or away from the fisherman? If you know that, it becomes a problem in geometry.

I would guess that the rays of light striking the fisherman's eyes are bent toward the fisherman's eyes.
 
Hee, hee poorly worded.

Words are way too often a lousy substitute for math and a diagram. So correct that which should read whether the rays reflected from the fish were directed above or below his eyes before hitting the surface.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top