Calculate the orbital radius of a synchronous satellite

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the orbital radius of a synchronous satellite, the correct approach involves using the gravitational force equation, GMm/R^2, to find the balance with centripetal acceleration. The orbital radius for a geosynchronous satellite is approximately 42,164 kilometers from the center of the Earth, or about 35,786 kilometers above the Earth's surface. The satellite must be in the plane of the Equator to maintain a fixed position relative to the Earth's rotation. For the second part of the question, a scale diagram can help determine the angle for a receiving aerial at 45 degrees latitude to effectively receive signals. Resources like Wikipedia and specific orbital mechanics websites can provide further guidance on these calculations.
james111
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'v been trying to work out this question for ages, but nothings quite working for me, here goes..

q. a) calculate the orbital radius of a synchronous satellite (one period of 24hr, so appears stationary above anyone point). Approximately how many radii of Earth is this orbital radius? Why does the satellite have to be in the plane of the Equator?

b) draw a scale diagram to estimate the angle above the horizontal that a receiving aerial in latitude 45 deg must point in order to receive signals from the satellite.

For a) I figured that I could use the eqn a = (v^2)/r for circular motion substituting v = 2rPi / (24x60x60) ... but this gives r as 1853078.528km :rolleyes: I think... which would be wrong. I don't know wot to do. :confused:

thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IIRC, geosynchronous satellites are something like 24,000 miles up (dunno if that's above the Earth's surface or measured from the center of the Earth, though). Because the acceleration due to gravity falls off in space, you need to figure out where the central acceleration due to that lower gravitational acceleration is correct for the orbital velocity. Do you know the equation that gives the gravitational acceleration in terms of two masses m and M and the gravitational constant G and the radius r?
 
Hey, I just checked wikipedia, and I was pretty close with my guess. James, *after* you work out this problem and get an answer close to my guess, check out the page at wikipedia.org about "geosynchronous".
 
GMm/R ?? I still can't figure how we can apply this. Sorry, this is quite a new area for me, and I still haven't fully figured it out.
 
james111 said:
GMm/R ?? I still can't figure how we can apply this. Sorry, this is quite a new area for me, and I still haven't fully figured it out.
Um, no. Close, but not correct. Do you have a textbook for this class? It should definitely be giving you this information before asking you this question.

I went back to the wikipedia page about geosynchronous orbits, and followed a link at the bottom of that page to a web page about orbital mechanics. It's a nice write-up, and it has the correct equation (similar to yours but with one term changed) part-way down the page. Try reading through this link to see if it helps this question make more sense.

http://www.braeunig.us/space/orbmech.htm
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top