Calculate the work as the MINIMUM amount of work

  • Thread starter Thread starter danago
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done by a weightlifter lifting a 100kg mass 2.4m. The minimum work required is determined to be 2352J, which corresponds to lifting the mass at a constant velocity, counteracting the gravitational force of 980N. It is clarified that applying exactly 980N is sufficient to lift the mass without acceleration, while any additional force would result in acceleration. The concept of work is emphasized as the product of force and distance, with potential energy changes also being a valid approach for calculating work done. Overall, understanding the balance of forces is key to accurately determining the work involved in lifting the weight.
danago
Gold Member
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
Hey. Heres the question:

"A weightlifter lifts a 100kg mass 2.4m from the floor. He then holds the mass steady for 3 seconds before dropping it. What is the work done by the weightlifer in raising the mass?"

Well. I know mass is applying a force downward of 980N because of gravity, so for this question, since an acceleration of the mass is not stipulated, do i just calculate the work as the MINIMUM amount of work he would do? Which would be around 2352J, so for the answer, would i just say that he must do MORE THAN 2352J of work to lift the weight?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't matter what the acceleration of the mass is. If here were to provide a drastic acceleration for 1 meter, he would no longer need to push upwards because the mass would have been thrown up and going up at this moment.
 
If an object is applying a weight force of 980N downwards, and i applied a force back on it of 980N upwards, the object would be stationary right?

So to make the mass move upwards, wouldn't it require that the weightlifer apply a force of MORE than the weight force of 980N? OR am i completely missing the point here
 
No you do not need to apply a force more that 980N, just 980N will do.

Any force that is more than 980N will result in an aceleration of the weight, since there is net force. ( X - 980 = Net force, where X >980)

The minimum amount of work that is required, requires the weight to be traveling at constant velocity.(Net force = zero, force applied=weight)

Hope it helps. :)
 
danago said:
If an object is applying a weight force of 980N downwards, and i applied a force back on it of 980N upwards, the object would be stationary right?

So to make the mass move upwards, wouldn't it require that the weightlifer apply a force of MORE than the weight force of 980N? OR am i completely missing the point here

Yes, you are completely missing the point! Work= force*distance. Any force, above 980 N, applied to accelerate the the mass so that it will move upward, will have to be "negated" by a force under 980 N to stop it. The work done by those will cancel. The only force that counts is the 980 N that must be applied upward to counteract gravity and keep the weight moving at constant speed.

Or, you could argue that the work done is the difference in potential energies at the two points- again, weight*distance.
 
Ahhh ok i see now :P

Thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top