Calculate the work done in polyatomic gas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done during an irreversible adiabatic expansion of a polyatomic gas. The initial parameters include 2 moles of gas at 300K and 10 atm, expanding to 1 atm. The work done is expressed as W = nCvΔT, with Cv derived from the universal gas constant and the specific heat ratio (γ). Participants highlight the challenge of determining the final temperature and volume, suggesting the use of the relationship PV^γ = constant, although there is a debate about its applicability to irreversible processes. The conversation emphasizes the need for alternative methods to find the necessary parameters for calculating work in this context.
paragchitnis
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the work done by the system in an irreversible (single step) adiabatic expansion of 2 moles of a polyatomic gas (\gamma = 4/3) from 300K and pressure 10 atm to 1 atm.


Homework Equations


Work done in adiabatic process
W = nCv\DeltaT
n = Moles of gas
Cv = R/(\gamma-1) R-Universal gas constant
\DeltaT- Change in absolute temperature

The Attempt at a Solution


The given answer is 405R. I am unable to find out the change in temperature as final temperature and volume are unknown. Is there any other formula to calculate the work done in adiabatic expansion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you aware that P V^{\gamma} = constant for adiabatic processes? You can find the final temperature using this fact and the ideal gas equation of state.
 
Pi-Bond said:
Are you aware that P V^{\gamma} = constant for adiabatic processes? You can find the final temperature using this fact and the ideal gas equation of state.

I think PV\gamma= constant is applicable for adiabatic reversible processes only. It is irreversible process..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top