Calculate the work done to locate a 150kg satellite

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done to locate a 150kg satellite in geostationary orbit, one must consider both the change in potential energy and the necessary kinetic energy for orbital speed. The gravitational potential energy equation is used, with the radius for geostationary orbit being approximately 42,245 km from the Earth's center. The change in potential energy is calculated by the formula ΔU = U_final - U_initial, where U_initial is at Earth's surface and U_final at geostationary orbit. It's important to clarify whether the question requires only potential energy or also includes kinetic energy for maintaining orbit. Ultimately, both components are crucial for a complete calculation of the work involved.
UnD
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
calculate the work done to locate a 150kg satellite into a geostationary orbit.

I'm guessing i need to use ep=- GMmG/r
but it would be possitive right?

the radius will be 35800 km? or 42,245 cause the 35800 is the altitude for the satellite?
m and M is mass of Earth and the satellity
so is this how to work out the right answer

6.67*10^-11 (mass of eath)(150)
-----------------------------------------
35800000 or 42,245 000
Is this the correct way??/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what the question means, exactly. To loft the satellite, you'd need to do work against gravity. This is what you're calculating. You'd need to use the height above the Earth's surface for the distance, since this is the distance through which you're lifting it.

However, to maintain it in orbit, you'd also need to give it the proper speed, which implies you'd need to add kinetic energy. From the way the question is worded, I'm not sure whether you'd be expected to include that or not. It all turns on what is meant by "locate [it] into orbit". If you do need to include it, just calculate the necessary speed for the satellite and it becomes a plug and chug.
 
GMmG/r should only have one G, i.e. GMm/r.

Calculate the change in potential energy from Earth's surface to GEO, and as Diane indicated the change in rotational kinetic energy.
 
UnD,
The equation that you mention is the potential energy, at a distance r from Earth centre, relative to an infinite distance from Earth - that is at infinity the potential energy is zero (which you can see from the equation). To put the satellite in a geostationary orbit you would need to change (raise) it's potential energy, \Delta U, and give it the appropiate orbital speed to stay in orbit at this distance. The change in potential energy is given by
\Delta U = U_{final} \ - \ U_{initial}
where the initial potential energy is at a distance equal to the radius of the earth. This can be calculated by using your equation to be
= GMm\left(\frac{1}{r_o} \ - \ \frac{1}{r_1}\right)
where r_o is the radius of the Earth and r_1 is the geocentric radius. You can see that this change in potential energy is positive as one would expect.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top