Calculate thrust of a rocket in order to approach and keep a position is space ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the thrust required for a rocket to approach and maintain a position in space, with a focus on the variables involved in such calculations. Participants explore the implications of Newtonian physics in a simplified model of space travel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the variables necessary for calculating thrust, including location, target location, thrust vector, and gravity, while expressing uncertainty about horizontal movement calculations.
  • Another participant questions the definition of "fixed" position in space, suggesting that gravitational influences complicate the notion of maintaining a stationary position relative to other bodies.
  • A later reply clarifies that the discussion assumes a Newtonian framework with fixed 3D vectors for locations, but acknowledges the complexity introduced by mass distribution and power requirements for thrust.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of instantaneous changes in thrust and rotation, with one participant noting that such changes are not physically possible.
  • Another participant emphasizes the challenges of being "fixed" in space due to gravitational interactions and the necessity of achieving stable orbits or continuous thrust to avoid collisions with massive bodies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of maintaining a fixed position in space, with some suggesting it is impossible due to gravitational influences, while others focus on the technical aspects of thrust calculations without reaching consensus on the implications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of information about the craft's mass and its distribution relative to thrusters, as well as the assumption of instantaneous thrust changes, which may not align with physical realities.

pixartist
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Okay, first of all, I'm not very good at maths, so I will have to talk in programmer terms here. I have the following issue:
A small rocket is moving in space, and I want it to move to and stay at a location in space, similar to a quadcopter.
No as far as I see it, I have the following variables to consider:
- Location
- Target Location
- Rotation / thrust vector
- Maximum thrust
- Gravity
- time delta

I want my function to output the thrust multiplier (0-1) and the change in rotation OR the optimal heading.

I do NOT have information about:
- How quickly I can change the rotation of the craft

I can omit the following:
- How quickly thrust changes. It changes instantly.
- Air resistance

Now, I'm aware that I can not expect a perfect calculation since I will have to approximate how rotational impulses will affect the craft, but I would like to have a good approximation. I can get a relatively good approximation for the altitude, but horizontal movement is giving me a headache.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Pixartist.
I can't get into any specifics about it, but it would be nice to know whether you mean the exact same spot in space, or the exact same spot relative to another craft, or the exact same spot over a planet, or... well, you get it. If you mean the same spot in space, I don't believe that it can be done because space itself is dragged along in gravitational fields. For a ship-to-ship meeting, you have to match orbits or flightpaths with it. In the case of a planet, you need to achieve geosynchronous orbit.
Good luck with it. Someone else will have to take it from here.
 
I'm sorry, I mean a simple Newtonian space. Locations are simple 3D-Vectors and are fixed above the surface.

For example target could be 100,100,0 meaning 100 meters right, 100 meters high and 0 meters back in space relative from the location the craft started (or whatever, the coordinate system is fixed anyway)
 
pixartist said:
target could be 100,100,0 meaning 100 meters right, 100 meters high and 0 meters back in space relative from the location the craft
So if I've got this straight, that would be a spot approximately 142.5 metres away at a 45° angle upward from the starboard bow?
I still can't help with the answer for you, but I'm trying to make sure that I understand the question just out of curiosity.
Oh, geez... I just realized that I never mentioned some of the other things that you need to consider. For instance, the mass for power requirements, and the distribution of that mass relative to the thrusters (to figure out leverage factors for rotation). That's all a little confusing, though, since you specified instantaneous change. That's not physically possible no matter what formulae you try to apply.
 
Last edited:
Fixed relative to what? The earth? Sun? Galaxy? The problem is nothing is really "fixed" in space.

Whatever it is you mean, in space it's not so easy to have something be "fixed", because every body in space interacts gravitationally with every other body. Close to the earth, the Earth obviously has the greatest influence. Whatever produces the greatest local gravity, you WILL eventually crash into it if you attempt to be "fixed" above it. If you want to avoid crashing into it, you have to get into a stable orbit (but that's requires movement) or you will have to continually fire your thrusters (but that requires fuel).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K