Calculate Time for Discharging Capacitors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rupturez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time it takes for a capacitor to discharge to a practical zero voltage. The equation for instantaneous voltage during discharge is provided, but the challenge arises when trying to determine the time for complete discharge, as it leads to an undefined answer when substituting zero volts. Participants clarify that due to the nature of exponential decay, a capacitor never truly reaches zero volts in finite time. Instead, they suggest defining a "practical" voltage level, such as 5% or 1% of the initial voltage, and using the time constant formula to estimate the discharge time. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of setting a practical threshold for voltage when calculating discharge time.
Rupturez
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
okay my Question is on discharging capacitors.
the equation for instantanious voltage of a capacitor whilst dischargeing is : v=Vi*e^-t/R*C

However I am not sure how to find the time for a capacitor to completely discharge to zero volts.

When I transpose for t
t=-(R*C)*ln(v/Vi)

and input v as zero (cap has completely discharge) we get an undefined answear.
I havnt studied calculus and am not familiar with the concept of limits.

how would I go about finding the precise time for a capacitor to discharge without using a normalised universal time constant curve to estimate the answear.

thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Of course you get a dippy answer. With exponential processes, you Never get to zero. Each interval of RC seconds, the volts decrease by 1/e. You can't get to zero without an infinite value for the time.
Of course, 'as near zero as dammit' would take a very finite time! (Engineer speaking)
 
I understand the voltage will never actually reach absolute zero, however I am after the "practicle" time for the capacitor to reach "practicle" zero voltage.
 
First decide on what is an acceptably low voltage for your purpose and then put it in your formula.
 
Rupturez said:
I understand the voltage will never actually reach absolute zero, however I am after the "practicle" time for the capacitor to reach "practicle" zero voltage.

Hi Ruptures. As sophiecentaur has pointed out, it is the nature of the (negative) exponential function that it never reaches precisely zero in any finite time. A "practical" time depends upon just how close to zero you consider "practically zero", but two common choices are

- 5%, which takes almost exactly 3 time constants, and

- 1%, which takes approximately 5 times constants.
 
Last edited:
Ahh 5 time constants that rings a bell. thanks uart
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Back
Top