Calculate Work Done by Force (152N): 1657.2J

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaDoctor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Joules Newtons
AI Thread Summary
The work done by the force of 152N over a distance of 13m at an angle of 33° is calculated to be 1657.2J. The discussion centers on the need to round this value to 1660J, which is related to significant figures in the measurements used. Since the force has three significant figures and the distance has two, the final answer should reflect the least number of significant figures, which is two in this case. This rounding ensures that the precision of the result is consistent with the measurements provided. Understanding significant figures is crucial in scientific calculations to maintain accuracy.
DaDoctor
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
PHSCS41-716.jpg

How much work is done by the force?
W= F * Δs * CosθW= (152N) * (13m) * Cos(33°)
W=1976 * Cos(33°)
W=1657.2

So I'm fairly confident I got this right since the answer is 1660J my question is Why would I have to round it up to 1660 to get it to Joules? I'm not really looking for help on the answer just an explanation as to WHY? Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's already in joules. When you multiply force by distance,
W=F*d*cos(theta)
Joules = Newtons * meters * [no dimensions for trig]
 
  • Like
Likes DaDoctor
Engineer at UIC said:
It's already in joules. When you multiply force by distance,
W=F*d*cos(theta)
Joules = Newtons * meters * [no dimensions for trig]
ok but why the rounding to 1660 from 1657? That is kind of confusing to me so i really want to know to make sure I am not missing anything important.
 
DaDoctor said:
ok but why the rounding to 1660 from 1657? That is kind of confusing to me so i really want to know to make sure I am not missing anything important.

You can only answer with as many significant figures as you're given. 1657 is 4 significant figures, but your force only had three.
 
  • Like
Likes DaDoctor
Engineer at UIC said:
You can only answer with as many significant figures as you're given. 1657 is 4 significant figures, but your force only had three.
Oh... that makes a lot of sense! Thank you for your help!
 
Engineer at UIC said:
You can only answer with as many significant figures as you're given. 1657 is 4 significant figures, but your force only had three.
The force has three sig figs, but I believe the distance the box was moved (13 m) only has two.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top