Calculating Acceleration of Skateboarder on 11.9m Ramp

  • Thread starter Thread starter miniz88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Ramp
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the skateboarder's acceleration down an 11.9-meter ramp, one can use kinematic equations that relate distance, final speed, and acceleration, even without time. The skateboarder starts from rest and reaches a speed of 6.77 m/s at the bottom, allowing for the determination of her acceleration. The second part of the problem involves finding the horizontal component of her acceleration, which requires resolving the total acceleration into its components based on the ramp's incline of 29.8 degrees. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively. The discussion emphasizes the importance of kinematic equations and vector resolution in physics problems.
miniz88
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A skateboarder, starting from rest, rolls down a 11.9-m ramp. When she arrives at the bottom of the ramp her speed is 6.77 m/s. (a) Determine the magnitude of her acceleration, assumed to be constant. (b) If the ramp is inclined at 29.8 ° with respect to the ground, what is the component of her acceleration that is parallel to the ground?




The Attempt at a Solution



I don't even have a clue where to start? How can i figure out the magnitude of acceleration without the time?? And i dnt even understand what the second part is asking at all?

Any help on where to start is appreciated..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't even have a clue where to start? How can i figure out the magnitude of acceleration without the time??
You may not have the time, but you have the distance. Take a closer look at your kinematic equations.

And i dnt even understand what the second part is asking at all?
Since she is accelerating down the ramp (so at an angle with the ground). You can resolve her acceleration into horizontal and vertical components.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top