Calculating air resistance on air

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the decrease in wind velocity over a distance due to air resistance, specifically in a turbulent flow scenario involving an oscillating object. The user is uncertain about applying the air resistance formula, particularly regarding the treatment of length and the coefficient of drag for air. They express confusion over how to relate the formula to air as a fluid rather than a solid object. The complexity of fluid dynamics is acknowledged, with a call for assistance in finding relevant equations. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of applying solid object dynamics principles to fluid behavior.
E.L
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Fluid Dynamics - Calculating air resistance on air

Homework Statement



I'm trying to figure out how much the velocity of wind will decrease by over a given distance. I know the velocity at a point 1cm after it has passed over an object, and i need to determine the velocity at the object. The flow is turbulent and the object is oscillating.


Homework Equations



I know the formula for air resistance is F=1/2"rho"v^2*C*L^2, where rho is the density, v is the relative velocity, c is the coefficient of drag and L is the length.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea what to do when the question concerns air resistance acting on air. I do not know how to treat length in the equation, as I don't understand how air can have a length. I also do not understand how to find the coefficient of drag on air.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think that equation applies. As far as I know it's only relevant for solid objects moving through air (by the way, in the general form it's F = ρCAv^2/2, where A is cross-sectional area presented to the air).

What you're trying to calculate is like a fluid dynamics problem, and although I'm not familiar with much fluid dynamics myself, it seems fairly complex. Maybe someone else will know of a relevant equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top