Calculating Ammonia/Water Ratio for pH Adjustment

  • Thread starter Thread starter FC Copenbadly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ph Relationship
AI Thread Summary
To raise the pH of 100,000 liters of stormwater from 8 to 9 or greater, the concentration of ammonia (NH3) needed at 25% concentration and a pH greater than 13 is being inquired about. The initial pH of the water was between 7 and 7.5, and the current pH is 8. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the water's buffering capacity, as this will influence the amount of ammonia required to achieve the desired pH increase. Further details on the water's composition may be necessary for a precise calculation.
FC Copenbadly
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello!

If I have 100,000 litres of water at a pH of 8. How much NH3 at a concentration of 25%, pH >13 would I require to bring total pH to 9 or greater. An approximate figure would suffice if anyone can help.

Thanks in advance.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
We need to know what is in the water and its concentration that is keeping the pH at 8. Is it buffered at pH 8, for example?
 
Hi,

Thanks for the reply.

It's just a reservoir of storm water. The pH before hand might have been 7 or 7.5, I'm just wondering how much ammonia it would take to raise the pH of 100,000 litres by 1. Either from 7 - 8 or 7.5 - 8.5 Hopefully this is enough information but if you require more I'll do my best and thanks again.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top